News
Article
Author(s):
Frontline maintenance therapy with avelumab following platinum-based chemotherapy led to similar outcomes in routine clinical practice and the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial in metastatic urothelial cancer.
Frontline maintenance therapy with avelumab (Bavencio) following platinum-based chemotherapy led to similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in the pivotal phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432), according to findings from the US PATRIOT-II trial examining real-world outcomes with the immune therapy in the United States.1
Results from the trial, which were presented at the 2024 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, demonstrated that the median real-world PFS and OS from the start of avelumab was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.8-6.9) and 24.4 months (95% CI, 20.4-28.4), respectively. The median OS from the start of platinum-based chemotherapy was 30.5 months (95% CI, 23.4-37.6).
“These real-world results further support the use of avelumab frontline maintenance in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who are progression free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy,” the study authors wrote in the poster.
Avelumab received regulatory approval from the FDA in June 2020 based on data from JAVELIN Bladder 100, which showcased a significant improvement in PFS and OS with avelumab plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who had not progressed on frontline platinum-based chemotherapy.2 In updated results from the trial, the median OS from the start of chemotherapy was 29.7 months (95% CI, 25.2-34.0) with avelumab/BSC vs 20.5 months (95% CI, 19.0-23.5) with BSC alone (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.636-0.921).3
PATRIOT-II was a US-based, retrospective chart review study conducted across 37 community oncology and academic affiliated centers.1 A total of 160 patient records were included in the analysis. To be eligible for inclusion, patients had to be at least 18 years of age at diagnosis and have histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic disease without progression on frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. They also must have started avelumab as first-line treatment.
Patients were followed from the start of platinum-based chemotherapy until 52 weeks after the start of avelumab, death, or end of study.
In addition to PFS and OS, investigators evaluated treatment patterns, reasons for treatment discontinuation, adverse effects (AEs), immune-related AEs (irAEs) and high-dose steroid use, as well as health care resource utilization, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, real-world time to treatment discontinuation, and real-world time to next line of treatment.
Regarding baseline characteristics, the median patient age was 70 years (range, 40-90) and more than half were male (76.9%). Most patients were White (89.4%), non-Hispanic or Latino (78.1%), and had an ECOG performance status of 0 (42.5%) or 1 (33.1%). A similar percentage of patients had creatinine clearance of at least 60 mL/min (40.0%) or less than 60 mL/min (41.3%). Approximately half of patients had unknown PD-L1 status (51.9%), visceral metastasis at the start of platinum-based chemotherapy (44%) and had received cisplatin (62.5%) as opposed to carboplatin and gemcitabine (37.5%). Additionally, most patients achieved complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy (81.3%); 10.6% had stable disease as their best response and 8.1% of responses were unknown.
Landmark analysis demonstrated that the 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month PFS rates from the start of avelumab were 48.1%, 33.0%, 27.3%, 21.8%, 19.2%, and 19.2%, respectively. The 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month OS rates from the start of avelumab were 88.1%, 75.7%, 62.5%, 53.4%, 44.0%, and 31.4%, respectively.
Regarding the real-world OS from the start of platinum-based chemotherapy, the 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month rates were 99.4%, 85.6%, 74.9%, 65.4%, 50.9%, 44.9%, respectively.
In terms of safety, 39% of patients had an avelumab-related AE, 22% had an irAE, 14% received high-dose steroids due to any treatment-related AE (TRAE), 8% were hospitalized because a TRAE, and 10% discontinued therapy because of an AE. Study authors noted that the rate of avelumab-related AEs in the real-world experience was lower than the rate reported in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (78%). However, they stated that this was likely because AEs were not prospectively evaluated in the real-world experience.
The most common TRAEs were fatigue (4.4%), hypothyroidism (4.4%), anemia (3.8%), infusion-related reaction (3.8%), nausea (3.8%), elevated creatinine (3.1%), diarrhea (2.5%), and rash (2.5%).
During maintenance therapy with avelumab, 28% of patients were hospitalized for a mean of 11.5 days per person-year. Avelumab-related AEs were the primary reason for admission (8%), followed by disease progression, surgical procedures, and comorbidities. A total of 16% of patients were hospitalized for a mean of 3 days per person-year during the platinum-based chemotherapy period.
During the platinum-based chemotherapy and avelumab periods, 7% and 8% of patients required an emergency department visit, respectively. Health care resource utilization was higher during and 90 days after patients finished avelumab compared with the platinum-based chemotherapy period, which the study authors attributed to potential cofounders including disease progression.