Commentary

Video

Dr Gross on Updated Survival Outcomes With Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab in CSCC

Neil D. Gross, MD, FACS, discusses 1-year follow-up data from a phase 2 study of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.


Neil D. Gross, MD, FACS, surgeon-scientist, director, Clinical Research, the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses 1-year follow-up data from a phase 2 study (NCT04154943) of neoadjuvant cemiplimab (Libtayo) in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).

In part 1 of this non-randomized, multicenter study, patients with stage II-IV CSCC received neoadjuvant cemiplimab followed by surgery with curative intent. Subsequent treatment in part 2 was determined by investigator discretion, and included up to 48 weeks of adjuvant cemiplimab, radiotherapy, or observation only.

Results demonstrated a robust 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate with the cemiplimab regimen, Gross says. After a median follow-up of 18.7 months, the estimated 12-month EFS was 89.0% (95% CI, 79.1%-94.3%) for patients in the overall population (n = 79), he reports. This included a major pathologic response rate of 88.9% (95% CI, 43.3%-98.4%) and a pathologic partial response rate of 100.0% (95% CI, not evaluable [NE]- NE). Notably, the 40 patients who achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) had more favorable outcomes, achieving a 12-month EFS of 94.9% (95% CI, 81.0%-98.7%) and experiencing no disease recurrence, Gross adds. Conversely, those who did not undergo surgery or were non-responders demonstrated an estimated 12-month EFS of 72.0% (95% CI, 43.8%-87.7%).

Lastly, the estimated 12-month overall survival (OS) rate for the overall patient cohort was 92%, further emphasizing the clinical benefit of this treatment approach. There were no new safety concerns associated with neoadjuvant cemiplimab, indicating that its use in this setting is well-tolerated.

The absence of disease recurrence among patients who achieved a pCR underscores the potential for cemiplimab to enhance long-term disease control and highlights its role in improving patient outcomes. Overall, these findings support the continued investigation of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in a planned phase 3 trial, Gross concludes.

Related Videos
Daniel DeAngelo, MD, PhD
Marc J. Braunstein, MD, PhD, associate professor, Department of Medicine, co-director, Hematology-Oncology System, New York University (NYU) Grossman Long Island School of Medicine
Douglas W. Sborov, MD, MS, associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine—Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies; director, Hematology Disease Center and Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Program, the University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute
Bradley C. Carthon, MD, PhD
David C. Fisher, MD
Alan Tan, MD
Binod Dhakal, MD
Sheldon M. Feldman, MD
Yair Lotan, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center
Alan Tan, MD, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center