Video

A Phase I Study of Uproleselan Combined with Azacitidine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Older or Unfit Patients with Treatment Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brian A Jonas, MD, reviews the results of the phase 1 study evaluating the use of uproleselan in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax in patients that are older or unfit for treatment naïve acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Background
- VIALE-A established azacitidine (AZA) with venetoclax (VEN) as a standard of care for AML ineligible for induction chemotherapy (IC).
- Patients (Pts) who achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) had improved outcomes; however, only 41% of CR/CRi responders achieved MRD negativity.
- Uproleselan (UPRO) is a novel E-selectin antagonist that disrupts cell survival pathways and improves chemotherapy responses in preclinical models, including in combination with AZA +/- VEN.
- A phase 1/2 study of UPRO combining with IC in AML pts established a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).
- UPRO was associated with higher CR/CRi and MRD negative (MRD-ve) rates, lower induction mortality, and less severe mucositis compared to historical controls.
- We are exploring the combination of UPRO with AZA/VEN to improve outcomes in pts with untreated AML ineligible for standard IC.

Methods
- This ongoing single center phase 1 trial of frontline UPRO in combination with AZA/VEN in older or unfit AML pts (NCT04964505) consists of a dose optimization portion, using a modified 3+3 dose optimization design to confirm the RP2D UPRO dose level (800 mg IV q12h for 7 days), and a dose expansion cohort.
- We report results of the dose optimization portion and initial expansion phase subjects. Key eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, AML diagnosis by WHO criteria, and eligibility for frontline AZA/VEN. Pts received UPRO 800 mg IV q12h and AZA 75 mg/m2 IV/SC q24h for 7 days, and VEN 400 mg PO daily for 28 days in 28-day cycles.
- Treatment continued until progression, intolerance, or patient decision to stop.
- Pts had a VEN ramp-up in cycle 1 including tumor lysis syndrome monitoring and prophylaxis.
- A bone marrow biopsy was done after every cycle until morphologic leukemia-free state or better response (MLFS+). UPRO was given for up to 6 cycles with dosing decreased to daily after achieving MLFS+.
- The primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability.
- Adverse events (AE) were monitored throughout treatment, and dose-limited toxicities (DLT) assessed in cycle 1.
- The secondary objective was to evaluate preliminary efficacy, notably MRD-ve CR/CRi rate, as measured by MFC.

Results

- As of June 26, 2022, 8 pts [75% female, median age 78 (range 70-81)] were enrolled in the dose optimization (n=6) and dose expansion (n=2) portions of the study.
- Four (50%) had de novo AML and 4 (50%) had secondary AML, including 3 (38%) with therapy-related AML. Six (75%) had ELN 2017 adverse risk disease; 3 (38%) had complex cytogenetics.
- The most common mutations identified were RUNX1 (n=4), BCOR (n=2) and TET2 (n=2), and 1 patient each had TP53, NPM1, FLT3-ITD, or IDH2 mutations.
- All pts completed cycle 1. Median time on study is currently 126 days (range 32-179). Pts received a median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-6). No DLTs were observed.
- There were no deaths in the first 30 days from treatment initiation; there was 1 death from sepsis in the first 60 days.
- All pts had at least 1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE). The most common TEAE, regardless of grade and attribution, included anemia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=6), anorexia (n=4), nausea (n=4), neutropenia (n=4), fatigue (n=3), hypocalcemia (n=3), and hyponatremia (n=3). All pts experienced at least 1 ≥grade 3 TEAE, with anemia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=6), neutropenia (n=4), and febrile neutropenia (n=2) most common. Four pts (50%) experienced 9 total serious AEs (SAEs), including thrombocytopenia (n=2).
- There were 2 grade 5 events, sepsis and AML disease progression, both unrelated to UPRO.
- Two pts remain on study treatment, and 6 have discontinued study therapy [patient decision (n=4) and death (n=2)]. All pts with an MLFS+ had dose modifications and/or cycle delays.
- All 8 pts had a MLFS+ response. Five (63%) achieved CR and 1 CRi, for a total CR/CRi rate of 75%, and 2 achieved MLFS. Five CR/CRi responses occurred with cycle 1. Four of the CR/CRi responses were MFC MRD-ve, for an overall MRD-ve CR/CRi rate of 50% and 67% among the CR/CRi responders.

Conclusions

- Preliminary results from this phase 1 study reveal a tolerable safety profile of UPRO with AZA/VEN in pts with untreated AML ineligible for IC.
- No DLTs were observed, and the most common grade 3-4 AE and SAE were hematologic.
- The combination shows promising preliminary efficacy, including a 50% rate of MRD-ve CR/CRi.

Reference
Jonas BA, Welborn JL, Esteghamat NS, et al. A phase I study of uproleselan combined with azacitidine and venetoclax for the treatment of older or unfit patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia. Abstract presented at: 64th Annual ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 10-13, 2022; New Orleans, LA.



Related Videos
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
Farrukh Awan, MD, discusses treatment considerations with the use of pirtobrutinib in previously treated patients with hematologic malignancies.
Francine Foss, MD
Phase 3 MIRASOL Trial: Updated Overall Survival Results of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV) Versus Investigator’s Choice (IC) Chemotherapy in Patients (pts) With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC) and High Folate Receptor-Alpha (FR⍺) Expression
Phase 1/2 ALKOVE-1 study of NVL-655 in ALK-positive (ALK+) solid tumors
David C. Fisher, MD
Farrukh Awan, MD
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the role of genomic profiling in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the treatment goals in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.