Video

Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

Author(s):

Expert Riad Salem, MD, MBA, highlights key data from the phase 3 EPOCH study, which evaluated TheraSphere in patients with mCRC and liver metastases who failed first line chemotherapy.

Riad Salem, MD, discusses data from the following presentation:

  • Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial. (Mulcahy MF, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20: JCO2101839)
  • EPOCH is the first positive phase 3 global study of Y-90 [Yttrium 90] TARE [Transarterial radioembolization] and chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases.
  • This study examined safety and efficacy in patients with unresectable unilobar or bilobar colorectal metastases who were able to receive second-line irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Y-90 glass TARE and standard-of-care chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (n=215) or standard of care chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (n=213). Follow-up occurred every 8 weeks until disease progression or hepatic disease progression or death.
  • Primary end points were PFS [progression-free survival] and hPFS [hepatic PFS] adjudicated by BICR [blinded independent central review]. Secondary end points were OS [overall survival], ORR [overall response rate] by BICR, DCR [disease control rate] by BICR, TTSP [time to symptomatic progression], and TTDQoL [time to deterioration quality of life].
  • Safety/Efficacy Results:
    • The addition of Y-90 TARE to chemotherapy increased PFS from 7.2 to 8.0 months and increased hPFS from 7.2 to 9.1 months; these increases were statistically significant, and the study success criteria were met (PFS: HR 0.69; 1-sided P = .0013; hPFS: HR 0.59; 1-sided P < 0.0001).
    • No significant differences were found in OS.
    • Overall response rate in the TARE-chemotherapy group was nominally better than the chemotherapy alone group.
    • Chemotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between the groups.
    • No new, unexpected safety signals.
    • Y-90 did not compromise ability to receive additional chemotherapy.
Related Videos
Aparna Parikh, MD
Phase 3 MIRASOL Trial: Updated Overall Survival Results of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV) Versus Investigator’s Choice (IC) Chemotherapy in Patients (pts) With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC) and High Folate Receptor-Alpha (FR⍺) Expression
Phase 1/2 ALKOVE-1 study of NVL-655 in ALK-positive (ALK+) solid tumors
Aparna Parikh, MD, associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School; assistant in medicine, Hematology, Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital; attending oncologist, Tucker Gosnell Center for Gastrointestinal Cancers, the Henri and Belinda Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies
Mohammed Najeeb Al Hallak, MD, MS, and Sakti Chakrabarti, MD, on data for neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in dMMR colon cancer.
Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Phase 2 PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC)
Key Data from the CYTO-PV and MAJIC-PV Studies: Evaluating Ruxolitinib in Polycythemia Vera
Lorenza Rimassa, MD
Daratumumab + Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone in Patients With Transplant-ineligible or Transplant-deferred Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Phase 3 CEPHEUS Study
Phase 1 trial of DLL3/CD3 IgG-Like T-Cell Engager BI 764532 in Patients with DLL3 Positive Tumors: Patients with LCNEC