Article

ADP-A2AFP SPEAR T Cells Demonstrate Efficacy, Tolerability in Advanced HCC

Author(s):

ADP-A2AFPspecific peptide enhanced affinity receptor T cells were associated with an acceptable safety profile and elicited antitumor activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Bruno Sangro, MD, PhD

Bruno Sangro, MD, PhD

ADP-A2AFPspecific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T cells were associated with an acceptable safety profile and elicited antitumor activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to data from the third-dose cohort and expansion phase of a phase 1 trial (NCT03132792) that was presented during the 2021 International Liver Cancer Association Conference.1

At the data cutoff date of April 15, 2021, results showed that the disease control rate in the 13-patient cohort was 64% and 1 patient experienced a complete response. A total of 6 patients experienced stable disease (SD), 4 had SD less that 16 weeks’ duration and 2 had SD of at least 16 weeks’ duration. Four patients experienced progressive disease and 2 patients were not evaluated due to not having first scans at the time of the cutoff date.

“SPEAR T cells are autologous T cells that are engineered in vitro to express a T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes with high-affinity peptides from [alpha fetoprotein],” explained lead study author Bruno Sangro, MD, PhD, director of the Liver Unit and co-director of the HPB Oncology Area at Clinica Universidad de Navarra in Pamplona, Spain. "Based on this principle, this phase 1, first-in-human trial in patients with advanced HCC is testing if patients are compatible for the treatment, based on HLA compatibility and AFP expression. If they are eligible, patients are provided an infusion of SPEAR T cells after a lymphodepleting regimen, with safety and efficacy monitoring coming afterwards.”

Sangro noted that SPEAR T cells have access to a broader spectrum of intracellular and extracellular proteins, giving them the ability to target solid tumors.

After the lymphodepletion phase on days -7 to -5/-4 of the trial, patients were given a SPEAR T-cell infusion on day 1, followed by hospitalization until day 7. Post-infusion assessments included safety monitoring, cytokine monitoring, and T-cell persistence. Patients stayed on the trial until disease progression, death, or early study withdrawal. Long-term follow-up assessments are to be conducted every 6 months in years 1 to 5 and annually in years 6 to 15.

Key eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HCC not amenable to locoregional therapy with an ECOG performance score of 0 to 1. Eligible patients were those with progressive disease on, intolerant to, or refusing standard systemic therapy. Patients also needed to have a Child-Pugh score of 6 or less without ascites or encephalopathy and an HLA-A* 02:01 and evidence of tumor alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) expression, defined by tumor immunohistochemistry analysis or serum AFP greater than 100 ng/mL.

The cohort’s transduced cell dose was approximately 5 x 109 (1.2x 109-6 x 109). The median transduced cell dose was 5.11 x 109 (range, 5.05 x 109 to 5.64 x 109) in 3 patients and 7.34 x 109 (range, 4.42 x 109 to 9.98 x 109) in 10 patients. Both dose levels were given a lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 daily for 3 days and fluorouracil 30 mg/m2 daily for 4 days.

In the overall cohort, the median age of the population was 60 years (range, 32-75) and 77% were males. Patients had a median of 2 (range, 1-4) prior lines of systemic therapy and 4 patients had undergone prior liver cancer surgery. Common prior liver diseases included cirrhosis (n = 6), hepatitis B (n = 3), and hepatitis C (n = 5). The majority of patients (n = 8) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C at screening; 1 patient was stage A and 4 were stage B.

In terms of safety, the most common adverse events (AE) of any grade were neutropenia (54%), leukopenia, lymphopenia, and pyrexia (38% each). AEs of at least grade 3 included neutropenia (46%), leukopenia (38%), lymphopenia (31%), and febrile neutropenia (23%).

Serious AEs occurred in 4 patients, 2 of which were related to T-cell infusion. Febrile neutropenia, infusion-related reaction, cytokine release syndrome, back pain, and bile duct obstruction were observed in 1 patient each. There were no grade 4/5 serious AEs.

Most of the AEs were consistent with cytotoxic chemotherapy, cancer immunotherapy, and/or cell therapy. Hepatobiliary AEs were most consistent with HCC or underlying disease and no clear evidence of ADP-A2AFP–­induced hepatoxicity was reported.

Investigators found that higher SPEAR T-cell doses were associated with a decrease in serum AFP levels. They also noted that clinical benefit is associated with sustained reduction in serum AFP levels.

A positive correlation (r = 0.82; P >.0001) was observed between peak persistence and dose. Patients receiving the highest doses also had the most obvious persistence. SPEAR T-cell infiltration was seen in all available post-infusion tumor biopsies and was found to be higher in patients with SD.

“SPEAR T cells up to doses of 10 billion transduced cells have been associated with an acceptable safety profile,” concluded Sangro. “One patient had a sustained CR with normalization in serum AFP, indicating as a proof-of-concept that this form of cell therapy can be active in the setting of advanced HCC. ADP-A2AFP SPEAR T-cells persisted in the periphery in a dose-dependent manner and were detected in post-infusion tumor tissue.”

Reference

  1. Sangro B, Meyer T, Mahipal A, et al. Data from the third dose cohort and expansion phase of a phase 1 trial of ADP-A2AFP SPEAR T-cells for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancer types expressing alpha-fetoprotein. Presented at: 2021 International Liver Cancer Association Conference 2021. September 2-5, 2021. virtual. https://ilca2021.app.swapcard.com/event/ilca-2021/planning/UGxhbm5pbmdfNDA5MDQw
Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center