Article

Allovectin Falters in Late-Stage Melanoma Trial

Author(s):

Nearly two decades after clinical trials began, the investigational immunotherapy Allovectin failed to meet key endpoints in a phase III trial in patients with stage III/IV metastatic melanoma and will no longer be developed.

Vijay B. Samant,

President and CEO of Vical

Nearly two decades after clinical trials began, the investigational immunotherapy Allovectin (velimogene aliplasmid) failed to meet key endpoints in a phase III trial in patients with stage III/IV metastatic melanoma and will no longer be developed, according to Vical Incorporated, the drug’s manufacturer.

Allovectin did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in objective response rate at ≥24 weeks, its primary endpoint, or in overall survival, the secondary endpoint, when compared with first-line chemotherapy, the company said. No further details were released.

“We are disappointed that the trial did not meet either the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints, even though we believe it was well-designed and well-executed,” said Vijay B. Samant, president and chief executive officer of Vical, in a statement. “Based on this outcome, we are terminating the Allovectin program and focusing our resources on our infectious disease vaccine programs.”

The agent, also called Allovectin-7, is a plasmid-based immunotherapeutic that expresses the HLA-B7 and β2 microglobulin genes, forming a major histocompatibility (MHC) class I complex. Researchers believe it has multiple mechanisms of action, including immune responses that target treated and distal lesions.1

Designed to be injected directly into lesions as an outpatient treatment, Allovectin was being evaluated as an alternative to chemotherapy. In the phase III trial, 390 patients were randomized to receive either Allovectin (2-mg intralesional injection into a single lesion weekly for six consecutive weeks, repeated beginning after each eighth week), or a regimen of either dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 60 minutes, repeated every 28 days), or temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 orally once daily for five consecutive days, repeated every 28 days).

The negative trial results come at a time when immunotherapies are generating considerable excitement in the field of cancer treatment, particularly in melanoma. The emerging class of inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathways was among the highlights of the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

Allovectin, which would have been a first-in-class agent, had demonstrated encouraging results in patients with advanced melanoma prior to this week’s announcement. In a phase II trial, 15 of 127 evaluable patients achieved an objective response (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.2—17.4) with a median duration of response of 13.8 months (95% CI, 8.5– not estimable).2 A histological examination of tissue from two patients whose lesions were resected found no evidence of melanoma.

  1. Doukas J, Rolland A. Mechanisms of action underlying the immunotherapeutic activity of Allovectin in advanced melanoma [published online ahead of print October 5, 2012]. Cancer Gene Ther. 2012;19(12):811-817.
  2. Bedikian AY, Richards J, Kharkevitch D, et al. A phase 2 study of high-dose Allovectin-7 in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2010;20(3):218-226.

Related Videos
Thach-Giao Truong, MD
Thach-Giao Truong, MD, medical director, Melanoma Program, Cleveland Clinic
Alexander C. Van Akkooi, MD, PhD, FRACS
Meredith McKean, MD
Ahmad Tarhini, MD, PhD
Ahmad Tarhini, MD, PhD
Brendon M. Stiles, MD, discusses the FDA approval of perioperative durvalumab plus chemotherapy in early-stage non–small cell lung cancer.
Georgina V. Long, MBBS, PhD, FRACP
Samuel Cytryn, MD, and David B. Zhen, MD, discuss how immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has improved the durability of outcomes in advanced GI cancers.
Samuel Cytryn, MD, and David B. Zhen, MD, on factors for selecting nivolumab plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.