Opinion

Video

Amivantamab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion–Mutated Advanced NSCLC: Primary Results From PAPILLON, a Randomized Phase 3 Global Study

Mark A. Socinski, MD, reviews data from the PAPILLON study presented at ESMO 2023 on amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in the first line for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer.

Background

  • Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell–directing activity.
  • Ami combined with carboplatin/pemetrexed (ami-chemo) demonstrated safety and antitumor activity in the phase 1 CHRYSALIS study.
  • PAPILLON (NCT04538664) evaluated ami-chemo vs chemo in first-line EGFR Ex20ins advanced NSCLC.

Methods

  • Treatment-naïve pts were randomized 1:1 to ami-chemo or chemo.
  • The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review.
  • Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS after first subsequent therapy (PFS2), overall survival (OS), and safety.
  • Crossover to ami monotherapy was allowed for the chemo arm upon progression.

Results

  • Overall, 308 pts were randomized (ami-chemo, 153; chemo, 155); median age was 61/62 years, 56/60% female, 64/59% Asian, and 23/23% with history of brain metastases for ami-chemo/chemo, respectively.
  • At median follow-up of 14.9 months, the median PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI, 9.8–13.7) for ami-chemo vs 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.3) for chemo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30–0.53; P<0.001).
  • The 18-month PFS rate was 31% for ami-chemo vs 3% for chemo.
  • PFS benefit of ami-chemo was consistent across subgroups.
  • ORR was 73% (95% CI, 65–80) for ami-chemo vs 47% (95% CI, 39–56) for chemo (odds ratio, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.84–4.79; P<0.001).
  • Median PFS2 was not estimable for ami-chemo vs 17.2 months for chemo (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32–0.76; P=0.001).
  • Interim OS analysis (33% maturity) showed a favorable trend for ami-chemo vs chemo (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42–1.09; P=0.106), despite 66%, of chemo-randomized pts whose disease had progressed, receiving second-line ami.
  • The most common TEAEs (≥40%) for ami-chemo were neutropenia, paronychia, rash, anemia, infusion-related reactions, and hypoalbuminemia; no new safety signals.
  • Discontinuation of ami due to treatment-related AEs was 7%.

Conclusions

  • Among pts with EGFR Ex20ins advanced NSCLC, ami-chemo achieved superior PFS vs chemo.
  • Safety profile was consistent with that of each individual agent.
  • PAPILLON establishes ami-chemo as the new first-line standard of care in EGFR Ex20ins advanced NSCLC.

Girard N, Park K, Tang K et al. LBA5 Amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment in EGFR Exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Primary results from PAPILLON, a randomized phase III global study. Abstract presented at ESMO Congress 2023, October 20-24, 2023.

Related Videos
Cemiplimab Monotherapy for First Line Advanced NSCLC Patients with PD-L1 Expression ≥50%: 5-y Outcomes of EMPOWER-Lung
Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer with or without brain metastases: DESTINY-Breast12 primary results
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses molecular testing challenges in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the multidisciplinary management of NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of pathologists in molecular testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of RNA and other testing considerations for detecting NRG1 and other fusions in solid tumors.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the prevalence of NRG1 fusions in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.