Article

Belantamab Mafodotin/Pd Triplet Demonstrates Manageable Safety Profile in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Author(s):

The triplet regimen of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone was revealed to have a manageable safety profile, which is consistent with the known individual safety profiles of belantamab mafodotin or pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Suzanne Trudel, MD

Suzanne Trudel, MD

The triplet regimen of belantamab mafodotin-blmf (Blenrep) plus pomalidomide (Pomalyst) and dexamethasone (Pd) was revealed to have a manageable safety profile, which is consistent with the known individual safety profiles of belantamab mafodotin or Pd, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, according to updated findings from the ongoing, phase 1/2 Algonquin study (NCT03715478) that were presented during the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting.

The regimen was explored across 6 cohorts at different dosing schedules of belantamab mafodotin. Following a correlation with lower rates of blurred vision, neutropenia, and a superior progression-free survival (PFS), 2.5 mg/kw every 8 weeks was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for this agent.

“Belantamab mafodotin in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone demonstrates a manageable safety profile that is consistent with the known safety profiles of belantamab mafodotin and pomalidomide, individually,” Suzanna Trudel, MD, of the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, in a presentation of the findings. “Both those cohorts, [at a dose of] 1.92 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, demonstrated deep and durable responses, however, the 2.5-mg/kg dose cohort appears to have better efficacy with a [median] PFS of 25.3 months versus 16.2 months.

Belantamab mafodotin is a BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is currently approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 4 prior therapies, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, a proteasome inhibitor, and an immunomodulatory agent.

As part of the ongoing phase 1/2 Algonquin study, 56 patients were enrolled in October 2021 to receive either 1.92 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg of belantamab mafodotin plus Pd. There were 6 cohorts in total: belantamab mafodotin at 1.92 mg/kg as a single dose every 4 weeks (cohort 1; n = 12), at 2.5as a single dose and a 2.5-mg/kg loading dose followed by 1.92 mg/kg every 4 weeks (cohort 1a; n = 12), at a split dose of 2.5 mg/kg (n = 8), at a split dose at 3.4 mg/kg every 4 weeks (cohort 2; n = 12), at a bi-monthly dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 8 weeks (cohort 3a; n = 12), and at a tri-monthly dose of 2.5 mg/kg (cohort 3b; n = 8).

Patients in all cohorts also received pomalidomide at 4 mg on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone at 40mg weekly. Treatment continued until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

In part 1 of the trial, the primary end points were maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and/or highest dose with acceptable toxicity (RP2D), and objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point in the part 2 portion. Secondary endpoints were defined as efficacy—progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR)—and safety, including ocular toxicities.

Among all participants, the median age was 64 years (range, 36-81) and the median prior lines of treatment was 2.5 (range, 1-5). All enrolled patents were exposed to a PI and lenalidomide, while 75.4% were PI/lenalidomide refractory and 48.2% were daratumumab/lenalidomide/PI refractory.

The 4 cohorts presented at the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting included 1.92 mg/kg every 4 weeks, 2.5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, 2.5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, and 2.5 mg/kg every 12 weeks.

Among the 54 patients who were eligible for assessment at a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the ORR (>partial response [PR])/very good partial response [VGPR] rates) were 88.9%/72.2%. In a lenalidomide-/proteasome inhibitor (PI)–refractory group, the rates were 86.7%/86.7%; in a lenalidomide/PI/daratumumab (Darzalex)–refractory group, the rates were 92.3%/69.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (95% CI, 14.5–not reached [NR]), 25.3 months (24.9-NR), and 16.2 (8.7-NR), across the same groups, respectively.

Across the 4 study dose cohorts, the ORRs were as follows: 81.8%, 95.0%, 83.3% and 90.9%, in the 1.92-mg/kg every-4-weeks, 2.5-mg/kg every-4-weeks, 2.5-mg/kg every 8-weeks, and 2.5-mg/kg every-12-weeks cohorts, respectively. PR rates were 18.2%, 10.0%, 8.3%, and 36.4%, respectively; VGPR rates were 36.4%, 45.0%, 58.3%, and 45.5%, respectively.

The median PFS by different study dose cohorts were as follows: 16.2 months (95% CI, 8.7-NR) in the 1.92-mg/kg every-4-weeks cohort, 25.3 months in the 2.5-mg/kgevery-4-weeks cohort, and not reached in the 2.5-mg/kg every 8- and 12- weeks cohorts.

In total, 96.4% of patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs. Frequently occurring TEAS included keratopathy and blurred vision, which were reported by 100% of patients in the 1.92-mg/kg every-4-weeks cohort, 2.5-mg/kg every-4-weeks cohort, and 2.5-mg/kg every-8-weeks cohorts (N = 44) and 83.3% of patients in the 2.5-mg/kg every-12-weeks cohort (n = 10). Additional commonly occurring TEAEs included fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, constipation, fever, diarrhea, and nausea.

Grade 3 or higher TEAEs included keratopathy, blurred vision, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. The authors noted that neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were represented high grade non-ocular TEAEs to emerge in the study.

Severe adverse events (SAEs) presented in 50% of patients and 1 patient died due to acute respiratory syndrome. Two patients discontinued treatment because of an AE; 1 patient in the 2.5-mg/every-4-weeks cohort had leukoencephalopathy, which was not related to treatment, and 1 patient in the 2.5-mg/every-12-weeks cohort had elevated alanine aminotransferase, which was considered to be possibly related to treatment.

“[The median] PFS of 16.2 months for triple-refractory patients is favorable when compared with historical data from the management study, where an overall survival of 9.2 months is reported,” concluded Trudel. “2.5 mg/kg every 8 weeks was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose, based on the following a lower rate of grade 3 or higher blurred vision and neutropenia and a superior PFS.”

Reference

Trudel S, McCurdy A, Sutherland H, et al. Part 1 results of a dose-finding study of belantamab mafodotin in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Presented at: 2021 ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 1653.

Related Videos
Douglas W. Sborov, MD, MS
Meletios (Thanos) Dimopoulos, MD, professor, therapeutics, Hematology Oncology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine
Michel Delforge, MD, PhD
Ashraf Z. Badros, MBCHB, professor, medicine, Medical Oncology, Hematology Oncology, University of Maryland Medical System
Binod Dhakal, MD
Michel Delforge, MD, PhD, professor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, director, member, Leuven Cancer Institute, member, Senior Academic Staff, Council of the Faculty of Medicine, Council of the Department of Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, University of Leuven
Ajay K. Nooka, MD, MPH, FACP
Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD
Binod Dhakal, MD
In this final episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil, discuss plans for developing guidelines and policies to enhance management of bispecific T-cell engagers across various centers.