News

Article

Brexu-Cel Displays Comparable Efficacy Across Age Groups in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • Brexucabtagene autoleucel showed similar complete remission rates in patients aged 60-69 and those under 60 with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.
  • Minimal residual disease negativity was lower in the 60-69 age group compared to others.
SHOW MORE

Brexucabtagene autoleucel demonstrated similar efficacy across age groups of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Brexu-cel in B-ALL  Image Credit: © Свет Лана   – stock.adobe.com

Brexu-cel in B-ALL

Image Credit: © Свет Лана

– stock.adobe.com

Treatment with brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel; Tecartus) produced similar efficacy outcomes in patients 60 to 69 years of age with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) compared with those who were under 60 years old, according to findings from a real-world study presented during the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting.1

Patients who were less than 60 years of age (n = 220) achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate of 89%, including a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate of 74%. Patients who were 60 to 69 years of age (n = 57) also experienced a CR/CRi rate of 89%, with an MRD-negativity rate of 59%. These respective rates were 94% and 67% among patients who were 70 years of age or older (n = 19).

“The rates of CR were similar across the groups at approximately 90% and no statistically significant difference was detected between the groups,” Ibrahim Muhsen, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, said during the presentation. “MRD-negativity rates were numerically lower among patients aged 60 to 69 compared with other groups.”

Moreover, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the less than 60, 60 to 69, and 70-plus years age groups. The respective median OS values were 695 days, not yet reached, and 673 days (log-rank P = .8). The 6-month OS rates were 81%, 81%, and 73%, respectively, and the 12-month OS rates were 68%, 63%, and 61%, respectively.

There was also no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) by age and the median PFS values in the less than 60, 60 to 69, and 70-plus years age groups were 397 days, 393 days, and 259 days (log-rank P = .8). The 6-month PFS rates were 64%, 58%, and 56%, respectively, and the 12-month PFS rates were 51%, 52%, and 38%.

“It should be noted that the 12-months PFS [rate] and median PFS were lower in patients aged 70 and above. However, the number of patients in that group was small, which makes it very hard to draw any conclusions. Although we can see a plateau towards the end, a longer follow-up period is needed to better estimate how many patients are cured by this approach,” Muhsen commented.

Details of the Real-World Study

In October 2021, brexu-cel was the first CAR T-cell therapy approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL;1,2 the regulatory decision was supported by findings from the phase 1/2 ZUMA-3 trial (NCT02614066).2 Among the 55 patients enrolled in the study, only 8 were at least 65 years old and all of these patients achieved a CR/CRi.1

“Although multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapies in older patients with lymphoma, data on the efficacy and safety of brexu-cel in older patients with ALL remain very limited,” Muhsen noted.

To conduct their study, investigators identified adult patients with B-ALL who received brexu-cel from October 2021 to June 2024 across 40 US-based academic and community institutions using the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR-T in Adult ALL (ROCCA) consortium database. The dataset included 318 patients who underwent apheresis to receive brexu-cel, 22 of whom were not infused and thus not included in the analysis.

At baseline, the median age in the under 60 group was 36 years (IQR, 29-48). Sixty-two percent of patients were male, and patients were non-Hispanic White (44%), Hispanic (39%), or Black (7%). Patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (27%), 1 (52%), or 2 or more (12%). ALL subtypes were comprised of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative (47%), Ph-positive (29%), or Ph-like (22%) disease. The median follow-up was 309 days (IQR, 157-531). Patients received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (IQR, 2-5), including blinatumomab (Blincyto; 57%), inotuzumab (Besponsa; 45%), and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT; 42%). Patients received bridging therapy with chemotherapy (42%), immunotherapy (17%), or targeted therapy (14%), and most (51%) had active disease pre-apheresis whereas 28% had an MRD-positive CR and 12% had an MRD-negative CR.

In the 60 to 69 aged group, the median age was 64 years (IQR, 62-66) and 54% of patients were male. The group included patients who were non-Hispanic White (67%), Hispanic (18%), or Black (9%). Patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (12%), 1 (68%), or 2 or more (11%). ALL subtypes included Ph-negative (53%), Ph-positive (37%), or Ph-like (11%) disease. The median follow-up time was 296 days (IQR, 163-551). Patients received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (IQR, 2-5), including blinatumomab (60%), inotuzumab (44%), and/or allogeneic HCT (46%), and received bridging therapy with chemotherapy (32%), immunotherapy (18%), or targeted therapy (23%). Forty-six percent of patients had active disease, 25% had an MRD-positive CR, and 24% had an MRD-negative CR pre-apheresis.

Furthermore, patients in the 70-plus group were a median age of 73 years (IQR, 70-77) and most patients were male (53%). The group included patients who were non-Hispanic White (74%), Hispanic (21%), or Black (5%). Patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (11%), 1 (53%), or 2 or more (32%). ALL subtypes included Ph-negative (63%), Ph-positive (26%), or Ph-like (11%) disease. The median follow-up time was 395 days (IQR, 127-526). Patients received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (IQR, 2-3), including blinatumomab (68%), inotuzumab (26%), and/or allogeneic HCT (16%), and received bridging therapy with chemotherapy (42%), immunotherapy (26%), or targeted therapy (11%). Forty-two percent of patients had active disease, 42% had an MRD-positive CR, and 11% had an MRD-negative CR pre-apheresis.

Safety Findings Are Largely Consistent Across Age Groups

Patients in the under 60, 60 to 69, and 70-plus age groups experienced any-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) at respective rates of 84%, 86%, and 89% (P = .8). Grade 3 to 4 CRS occurred at rates of 11%, 4%, and 11%, respectively (P = .2). Any-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported in 48%, 56%, and 79% of patients, respectively (P = .03), and grade 3 to 4 ICANS occurred in 29%, 30%, and 32% of patients, respectively (P = .9).

In terms of hematotoxicity, the median time to absolute neutrophil count recovery was 16 days (IQR, 12-34), 15 days (IQR, 12-22), and 15 days (IQR, 11-19) in the under 60, 60 to 69, and 70-plus years old groups. The respective median times to platelet recovery were 27 days (IQR, 9-42), 31 days (IQR, 10-58), and 51 days (IQR, 27-63). Patients in all 3 arms required intravenous immunoglobulin infusion within 90 days (28% vs 18% vs 17%), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) use within 30 days (43% vs 33% vs 33%), GCSF use within 30 to 90 days (37% vs 30% vs 33%), thrombopoietin mimetics use on days 30 to 90 (6% vs 6% vs 6%), and red blood cell transfusion from days 30 to 90 (14% vs 22% vs 6%). Eighteen percent of patients in the under 60 group and 26% in the age 60 to 69 group required platelet transfusion from days 30 to 90. Patients in each group also experienced at least 1 any-grade infection (30% vs 30% vs 26%) and at least 1 grade 3 or higher infection (14% vs 4% vs 11%), respectively.

“The rates of a growth factor transfusion support and infections were not higher in older patients,” Muhsen said. “Our data support and confirm that treating patients with B-ALL age 60 and older with brexu-cel is feasible. Longer follow-up and a larger sample size, particularly in the 70-plus age group, are needed.”

Disclosures: Dr Muhsen did not report any disclosures.

References

  1. Muhsen I, Advani AS, Roloff GW, et al. Efficacy and safety of brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in patients aged 60 and above. Blood. 2024;144(suppl 1):523. doi:10.1182/blood-2024-210682
  2. FDA approves brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. FDA. October 1, 2021. Accessed December 6, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-brexucabtagene-autoleucel-relapsed-or-refractory-b-cell-precursor-acute-lymphoblastic
Related Videos
Javier Pinilla, MD, PhD, and Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, discuss factors that influence later-line treatment choices in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Javier Pinilla, MD, PhD, and Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, on the implications of the FDA approval of asciminib in newly diagnosed CP-CML.
Duvelisib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute