Article

CPX-351 Delivers Durable Improvement in OS in Older Patients With AML in Longer Follow-up

The fixed combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine continued to demonstrate improved overall survival vs 7+3 chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Jeffrey E. Lancet, MD

Jeffrey E. Lancet, MD

The fixed combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351; Vyxeos) continued to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) vs 7+3 chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to findings from the 5-year analysis of a pivotal phase 3 trial (NCT01696084).

Between December 20, 2012, and November 11, 2014, 309 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML were enrolled and randomized to receive CPX-351 (n = 153) or 7+3 (n = 156). At a median follow-up of 60.91 months (Interquartile range [IQR], 60.06-62.98) in the CPX-351 arm and 59.93 months (IQR, 59.73-60.50) in the 7+3 arm, the median OS was 9.33 months (95% CI, 6.37-11.86) with CPX-351 vs 5.95 months (95% CI, 4.99-7.75) with 7+3 (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91).

“After 5 years of follow-up, the improved OS with CPX-351 vs 7+3 was maintained, which supports the previous evidence that CPX-351 can contribute to long-term remission and improved OS in patients aged 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML,” wrote lead study author Jeffrey E. Lancet, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, and coauthors in the study publication.

CPX-351 is given as standard induction therapy for patients with AML; the agent comprises a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a 1:5 molar ratio.

Primary findings from the phase 3 trial (NCT01696084) supported the 2017 FDA approval of the fixed combination in patients 60 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML.

Eligible patients included those aged 60 to 75 years who had a pathological diagnosis of AML according to the World Health Organization 2008 criteria, no previous induction therapy for AML, and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2.

Patients were randomized to receive up to 2 induction cycles of CPX-351 at a dose of 100 units/m2 over a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 3, and 5; on days 1 and 3 for the second induction, or standard 7+3 chemotherapy, consisting of 100 mg/m2 of cytarabine daily in a continuous IV infusion for 7 days plus IV daunorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3; cytarabine for 5 days and daunorubicin on days 1 and 2 for the second induction (5+2).

Patients with complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi) could receive up to 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with CPX-351 at a dose of 65 units/m2 over a 90-minute infusion on days 1 and 3 or 5+2 chemotherapy.

OS served as the primary end point.

Additional results demonstrated favorable 3- and 5-year OS estimates. The 3-year OS rate was 21% with CPX-351 (95% CI, 15%-28%) vs 9% with 7+3 (95% CI, 5%-14%). The 5-year OS estimate was 18% (95% CI, 12%-25%) in the CPX-351 arm vs 8% (95% CI, 4%-13%) in the 7+3 arm.

In a multivariable analysis, better ECOG performance status, favorable- or intermediate-risk karyotype, lower white blood cell count, higher platelet count, and CPX-351 therapy was associated with improved OS.

When analyzed by age subgroup, the median OS and 3-year and 5-year OS rates favored the use of CPX-351 in patients aged 60 to 69 years and 70 to 75 years. In those aged 60 to 69 years old, the median OS was 9.59 months (95% CI, 6.01-12.62) with CPX-351 and 6.87 months (95% CI, 4.63-8.84) with 7+3 chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99). For patients between the ages of 70 to 75 years old, the median OS was 8.87 months (95% CI, 4.73-12.19) and 5.62 months (95% CI, 3.29-7.52), respectively (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.77).

In patients who underwent transplant, the median OS from the date of transplant was not reached (95% CI 16.23–not estimable) for CPX-351 vs 10.25 months (95% CI, 6.21-16.69) for 7+3 (HR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.90). At 3 years, the OS rate from the date of transplant was 56% (95% CI, 42%-68%) for CPX-351 vs 23% (95% CI, 11%-37%) for 7+3.

CR/CRi was reported in 48% of patients (n = 73 of 153) in the CPX-351 arm vs 33% of patients (n = 52 of 156) in the 7+3 arm. The median OS in patients with CR/CRi was 21.72 months (95% CI, 13.01-29.70) in patients who received CPX-351 vs 10.41 months (95% CI, 7.82-15.21) in patients who received 7+3 (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88).

No additional adverse effects were identified with long-term follow-up, apart from death related data. The most common cause of death in both arms was progressive leukemia (n = 70; 56% of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 arm vs n = 74; 53% of 140 deaths in the 7+3 arm). Six (5%) of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 arm vs 7 (5%) of 140 deaths in the 7+3 arm were treated related.

Causes of death that were potentially related to study treatment were sepsis (n = 2), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 2), multiorgan failure (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1) in the CPX-351 arm vs respiratory failure (n = 2), sepsis (n = 1), pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 1), brain hemorrhage (n = 1), cardiac arrest (n = 1), and multiorgan failure (n = 1) in the 7+3 arm.

Reference

  1. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Newell LF, et al. CPX-351 versus 7+3 cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: 5-year results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8(7):E481-E491. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00134-
Related Videos
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
Farrukh Awan, MD, discusses treatment considerations with the use of pirtobrutinib in previously treated patients with hematologic malignancies.
Francine Foss, MD
David C. Fisher, MD
Farrukh Awan, MD
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the role of genomic profiling in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the treatment goals in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss factors for picking intensive chemotherapy vs other regimens in acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss dose intensity and sequencing of CPX-351 in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.