Video

Dr Danilov on Treatment Considerations in High-Risk MCL

Alexey Danilov, MD, PhD, discusses considerations for varying treatment approaches in patients with high-risk mantle cell lymphoma.

Alexey Danilov, MD, PhD, associate director, Tino Stephenson Lymphoma Center, professor, Division of Leukemia, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, discusses considerations for varying treatment approaches in patients with high-risk mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

The treatment of patients with MCL continues to trend toward a precision medicine approach, Danilov begins. In a patient who presents with high-risk features, such as blastoid MCL with multiple genetic abnormalities, TP53 aberrations—specifically TP53mutations—a complex karyotype, are generally not considered good candidates for induction therapy with intensive chemotherapy or an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), due to lower efficacy associated with these options in high-risk patients, he adds. Additionally, they regimens are also associated with toxicities, and the lack of a progression-free survival benefit derived for these patients make chemotherapy or ASCT suboptimal options, Danilov says.

When selecting treatment options for high-risk patients with MCL, clinical trials serve as strong options; however, if a clinical trial is not available, novel therapy–based approaches are the preferred treatment choice, Danilov expands. These novel therapies could include lenalidomide (Revlimid), rituximab (Rituxan), or a BTK inhibitor–based approach, he notes.

The role of ASCT in the treatment of patients with MCL has continued to evolve, Danilov continues. Notably, in the phase 3 TRIANGLE trial (NCT02858258), the addition of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to standard chemoimmunotherapy induction followed by ASCT and 2 years of maintenance ibrutinib significantly improved failure-free survival vs standard chemoimmunotherapy induction and ASCT alone in younger patients with MCL. Additionally, patients who received ibrutinib and did not receive transplant as consolidation did just as well as those who received ASCT, still leaving some questions to be answered regarding the role of ASCT in the MCL space, Danilov concludes.

Related Videos
James J. Harding, MD, associate attending physician, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
J. Bradley Elder, MD
Rimas V. Lukas, MD
Adam E. Singer, MD, PhD, Health Sciences Clinical Instructor, medicine, division lead, kidney cancer, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA Health
Diane Reidy-Lagunes, MD, vice chair, Oncology Operations, Regional Care Network, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Shubham Pant, MD, MBBS
Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, professor, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, director, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine; Louisa and Rand Glenn Family Chair in Breast Cancer Research, director, Glenn Family Breast Center, director, Breast Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Brett L. Ecker, MD
Benjamin Garmezy, MD, assistant director, Genitourinary Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, chief, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center