Video

Dr Deol on CAR T-cell Therapy Selection for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Abhinav Deol, MD, discusses the selection of CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Abhinav Deol, MD, physician, Karmanos Cancer Institute, associate professor, Clinical Hematology and Oncology, Wayne State University, discusses the selection of CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Currently, 2 CAR T-cell therapies have been approved by the FDA for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; Abecma) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; Carvykti). Ide-cel was approved in March 2021 by the FDA, and cilta-cel was approved in February 2022. Data from the phase 2 KarMMA trial (NCT03361748) led to the approval of ide-cel, and data from the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) supported the approval of cilta-cel. Additionally, both treatments are approved for patients who received 4 or more prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.

Because these results are from 2 separate studies and the 2 CAR T-cell therapies have not been compared in a head-to-head prospective trial, it is difficult to compare them from an efficacy standpoint, Deol begins. However, when choosing between these 2 products, it is important to note that there is a long waiting list for patients who are eligible and want to receive CAR T-cell therapy, Deol expands. The availability of the manufacturing slots pose issues for both CAR T-cell therapies, and once an oncologist is informed that a manufacturing slot has become available, they will go to their patient list and approach the next patient who is eligible, Deol emphasizes.

There is no clear-cut distinction to separate between one CAR T-cell therapy from the other, Deol notes. The toxicities are similar between ide-cel and cilta-cel, and the response rates for each are closely aligned, Deol says. In the absence of head-to-head data, long-term follow-up data could also provide an indication of the durability of responses for both agents, Deol concludes.

Related Videos
Armin Ghobadi, MD, professor, medicine, Oncology, Section of Bone Marrow Transplant; clinical director, Center for Gene and Cellular Immunotherapy, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University
Timothy S. Fenske, MD, MS
Roxana S. Dronca, MD, discusses the FDA’s approval of subcutaneous nivolumab across solid tumor indications.
Craig Eckfeldt, MD
Whitney Goldsberry, MD
Jonathan Wesley Riess, MD, MS, an associate professor at the University of California (UC) Davis
Yair Lotan, MD, professor, urology, chief, urologic oncology, Jane and John Justin Distinguished Chair in Urology, UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center; medical director, Urology Clinic, UT Southwestern and Parkland Health and Hospital System
Laura A. Huppert, MD
Polly Niravath, MD
Arvind N. Dasari, MD, MS