Commentary

Video

Dr Kelly on the Role of Ripretinib in the GIST Treatment Paradigm

Ciara Kelly, MBBCh, BAO, discusses the current and potential roles for ripretinib in the gastrointestinal stromal tumor treatment paradigm.

Ciara Kelly, MBBCh, BAO, interim clinical director, Sarcoma Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the current and potential roles for ripretinib (Qinlock) in the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treatment paradigm.

On May 15, 2020, ripretinib received FDA approval as a fourth-line treatment for patients with advanced GIST who progressed on at least 3 prior kinase inhibitors, including imatinib (Gleevec). This regulatory decision was supported by data from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 INVICTUS trial (NCT03353753), in which ripretinib significantly increased median progression-free survival (PFS) from 1.0 months (95% CI, 0.9-1.7) in the placebo arm to 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-6.9; HR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.09-0.25; P < .0001]), Kelly reports.

Additionally, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines also currently recommend ripretinib for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced GIST who are intolerant to sunitinib (Sutent), Kelly adds. This recommendation is supported by findings from the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial (NCT03673501), which evaluated ripretinib vs sunitinib in the second-line setting. For patients in the KIT-mutant population, the study’s primary end point was PFS, she notes.

Results showed that the median PFS for patients with GIST harboring only mutations in KIT exon 11 and exons 13/14 was 15.0 months with sunitinib (n = 20) vs 4.0 months with ripretinib (n = 21; HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.71-9.11; nominal = .0005). Furthermore, PFS outcomes with ripretinib were more favorable than those with sunitinib in patients with mutations in KIT exon 11 and exons 17/18 at 14.2 months vs 1.5 months in the ripretinib (n = 27) and sunitinib (n = 25) arms, respectively (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.44; nominal < .0001).

Importantly, ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile compared with sunitinib, with fewer grade 3 and 4 adverse effects, Kelly continues. Additionally, ripretinib generated better patient-reported outcomes with respect to tolerability, she notes. These findings highlight ripretinib’s value as a treatment option for patients with GIST, particularly those who cannot tolerate other second-line therapies.

Clinicians referring a patient to MSK can do so by visiting msk.org/refer, emailing referapatient@mskcc.org, or by calling 833-315-2722.
Related Videos
Jennifer Scalici, MD
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Victor Moreno, MD, PhD
Tiago Biachi, MD, PhD
Dr Girard on De Novo and Acquired Resistance Alterations in HER2-Altered NSCLC
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.