Video

Dr. Tolaney on Remaining Questions With CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, discusses remaining questions with CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, associate director of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers; director of Clinical Trials, Breast Oncology; senior physician at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, discusses remaining questions with CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor (HR)—positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

One major questions with CDK4/6 inhibitors that has arisen is whether there are major differences in outcomes between patients who receive chemotherapy compared with those who receive endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibition. Some data from the Young-PEARL trial were presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting and offered some insight, says Tolaney.

In the phase 2 trial, investigators enrolled premenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who progressed on prior tamoxifen. These patients were randomized to receive either aromatase inhibition and palbociclib (Ibrance) or capecitabine. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the median progression-free survival was 19.0 months in the endocrine with palbociclib arm versus 11.3 months in the capecitabine arm. The trial demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibition is a very effective approach for this patient population and is likely superior to chemotherapy, concludes Tolaney.

Related Videos
Andrew Ip, MD
Mansi R. Shah, MD
Elizabeth Buchbinder, MD
Benjamin Garmezy, MD, assistant director, Genitourinary Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Alec Watson, MD
Sagar D. Sardesai, MBBS
Ashkan Emadi, MD, PhD
Matthew J. Baker, PhD
Manmeet Ahluwalia, MD, MBA, FASCO
John Mascarenhas, MD