Opinion

Video

Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic NSCLC: 5-Year Overall Survival Update from the POSEIDON Study

Joshua K. Sabari, MD, reviews data from the 5-year overall survival update from the POSEIDON study investigating durvalumab, tremelimumab, and chemotherapy in first-line metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.

Background

  • In the Phase 3 POSEIDON study, 1L treatment with tremelimumab + durvalumab + CT demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both PFS and OS vs CT alone in patients with mNSCLC
    • PFS HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.60–0.86; p=0.0003)*; OS HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.65–0.92; p=0.0030)
    • Based on these results, tremelimumab + durvalumab + CT was approved for 1L treatment of patients with mNSCLC
  • Durvalumab + CT significantly improved PFS vs CT, with a positive trend for OS improvement that did not reach statistical significance1
    • PFS HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.89; p=0.0009)*; OS HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.72–1.02; p=0.0758)
  • Long-term follow-up analyses of OS were prespecified
  • Here we report updated results after a median follow-up of >5 years‡, including analyses by histology (NSQ or SQ) and by STK11, KEAP1 or KRAS mutational status (m or wt)

Methods

  • Durvalumab 1500mg ± limited-course tremelimumab 75mg + CT q3w for 4 cycles
    • One additional dose of tremelimumab post-CT (week 16; 5th dose)
  • Followed by durvalumab q4w maintenance until PD, and optional pemetrexed q4w

Results

  • Sustained OS benefit for T+D+CT vs CT with HR 0.76 and 5-yr OS rates more than twice as high (15.7% vs 6.8%)
  • Long-term OS benefit with T+D+CT vs CT more pronounced in NSQ with HR 0.69 and 5-yr OS rates 20.5% vs 9.1%
  • OS benefit maintained for T+D+CT vs CT in STK11m with HR 0.57 and 5-yr OS rates 12.9% vs 0%
  • OS benefit maintained for T+D+CT vs CT in KEAP1m with HR 0.43 (small sample size)
  • OS benefit maintained for T+D+CT vs CT in KRASm with HR 0.55 and 5-yr OS rates 21.7% vs 8.1%
  • SAEs, including AEs leading to death, were collected during long-term follow-up
    • No other safety data were collected after the final analysis for OS superiority
  • Since the final analysis‡, 7 additional patients experienced SAEs (including 1 considered treatment related) and 4 additional patients had AEs leading to death (none treatment related)

Conclusions

  • Prespecified updated analyses from POSEIDON after median follow-up of >5 years demonstrate the durable long-term OS benefit of adding a limited course of tremelimumab to durvalumab (until PD) and 4 cycles of CT
    • OS HR vs CT 0.76 (95% CI 0.64–0.89); 5-year OS rates more than twice as high (15.7% vs 6.8%)
    • No new safety signals were identified in the long-term follow-up of SAEs
  • Across patient subgroups, long-term OS benefit was generally consistent with the ITT population
    • Updated OS benefit with tremelimumab + durvalumab + CT vs CT continued to be more pronounced in patients with NSQ vs SQ histology
    • Consistent with earlier analyses,1,2 the addition of tremelimumab to durvalumab and CT provided OS benefit regardless of PD-L1 expression, including in patients with PD-L1 TC <1%
  • OS benefit was maintained with tremelimumab + durvalumab + CT vs CT in STK11m (NSQ), KEAP1m* or KRASm (NSQ) mNSCLC
    • Harder-to-treat mutational subgroups in mNSCLC will be further explored in the upcoming randomised Phase 3B TRITON study (NCT06008093)
  • These results support the use of tremelimumab + durvalumab + CT as a 1L treatment option for patients with mNSCLC, including in harder-to-treat subgroups

Peters S, Chul Cho B, Luft A et al. LBA3 – Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic NSCLC: 5-Year Overall Survival Update from the POSEIDON Study. Abstract presented at ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress 2023, December 6-8, 2023.

Related Videos
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.