News
Article
Author(s):
The European Medicines Agency has validated the marketing authorization application for the use of imetelstat in the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has validated the marketing authorization application for the use of imetelstat in the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).1
The application is supported by data from the phase 3 IMerge trial (NCT02598661), in which treatment with imetelstat (n = 118) resulted in a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate of 39.8% (95% CI, 30.9%-49.3%) at 8 weeks vs 15.0% (95% CI, 7.1%-26.6%) with placebo (n = 59) in this population (P < .001).2 This benefit with imetelstat vs placebo across key subsets, including those without ring sideroblasts (31.8% vs 8.7%l P = .038) and those with a prior RBC transfusion burden of greater than 6 units every 8 weeks (33.9% vs 7.4%; P = .023). The 24-week RBC-TI rates with the agent were 28.0% (95% CI, 20.1%-37.0%) and 3.3% (95% CI, 0.4%-11.5%), respectively (P < .001).
Most patients (83%) who achieved 8-week RBC-TI with imetelstat experienced durable continuous RBC-TI episodes. Those who received imetelstat and achieved RBC-TI at 8 weeks had a significantly longer duration of TI than those given placebo, at 51.6 weeks (95% CI, 26.9-83.9) vs 13.3 weeks (95% CI, 8.0-24.9), respectively (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.57; P < .001).
A significant improvement in hematologic improvement–erythroid (HI-E) was also observed with imetelstat vs placebo, at rates of 42.4% (95% CI, 33.3%-51.8%) and 13.3% (95% CI, 5.9%-24.6%), respectively (P < .001). Moreover, a significant and sustained increase in hemoglobin was observed in those who received imetelstat vs placebo, at a median rise of 3.6 g/dL (range, -0.1 to 13.8) and 0.8 g/dL (range, -0.2 to 1.7), respectively.
“The EMA validation of the marketing authorization application for imetelstat brings us one step closer to potentially offering this first-in-class therapeutic to lower-risk MDS patients in the European Union suffering from anemia,” John A. Scarlett, MD, chairman and chief executive officer of Geron Corporation, stated in a press release.1 “Based on the clinical profile of imetelstat to date, we are optimistic about its potential to become a standard of care and address longstanding unmet needs of lower-risk MDS patients.”
The double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled patients with low- or intermediate-1 risk MDS by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria who were relapsed or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or had an erythropoietin level of over 500 mU/mL.2 Patients also needed to be transfusion dependent, which was defined as requiring at least 4 unites of RBCs every 8 weeks over the 16 weeks before the study. They could not have 5q deletions or have prior exposure to lenalidomide (Revlimid) or hypomethylating agents.
Study participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive imetelstat at 7.5 mg/kg every 4 weeks or placebo. Patients were stratified by transfusion burden (4 to 6 units vs over 6 units) and IPSS risk category (low vs intermediate-1).
The primary end point of the trial was RBC-TI at 8 weeks, and important secondary end points included 24-week RBC-TI rates, duration of TI, HI-E rates, and safety. Exploratory end points included variant allele frequency changes and patient-reported outcomes measured by FACIT-Fatigue.
The median age across the investigative and control treatment arms was 72.5 years (range, 39-87), with more than half of patients being male (60% vs 67%). Sixty-two percent of those in both arms had ring sideroblasts by World Health Organization classification. Most patients had low IPSS risk category (68% vs 66%), and the median prior RBC transfusion burden in both arms was 6 (range, 4-33). The median pre-treatment hemoglobin level in the imetelstat arm was 7.9 g/dL (range, 5.3-10.1) vs 7.8 g/dL (range, 6.1-9.2) in the placebo arm. Prior ESA use was noted in 92% and 87% of patients, respectively.
At a data cutoff date of October 13, 2022, the median duration of treatment in the investigative arm was 33.9 weeks vs 28.3 weeks in the placebo arm, with 22.9% vs 23.7% of patients, respectively, still receiving treatment on study. In the imetelstat arm, the most common reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy (23.7%), followed by an adverse effect (AE; 16.1%), other (16.1%), disease relapse following response on study (14.4%), disease progression (5.9%), and death (0.8%).
Regarding safety, the most common grade 3 or 4 AEs reported in the imetelstat (n = 118) and placebo (n = 59) arms, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (62% vs 8%) and neutropenia (68% vs 3%). Most of these effects occurred during the first 3 treatment cycles, and the median duration of these effects was less than 2 weeks with more than 80% of cases found to be reversible to grade 2 or less within 4 weeks. Additionally, 34.7% vs 3.4% of those in the imetelstat and placebo arms, respectively, received 1 or more doses of a myeloid growth factor.
Nonhematologic toxicities were noted to be generally low grade. Approximately 75% of patients who received imetelstat required dose modifications because of AEs and less than 15% discontinued. Notably, no cases of Hy’s Law or drug-induced liver injury were reported.
In August 2023, the FDA accepted a new drug application seeking the approval of imetelstat for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in patients with lower-risk MDS.3 This application was also based on IMerge data.