Video

Extended RAS Testing in Metastatic CRC

For High-Definition, Click

The collection of evidence from multiple clinical trials has suggested that extending RAS testing beyond KRAS exon 2 enhances patient selection in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The extended testing, which includes KRAS and NRAS, optimizes the use of the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab and prevents potential harm for patients with mCRC, notes Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD.

Given the level of added benefit seen across several phase III studies, extended RAS testing should become mandatory, believes Axel Grothey, MD, and Al B. Benson III, MD. Despite this need, some community oncologists still do not have the capacity to run the extended testing, particularly since insurers and payers do not require it as part of the prescreening process, notes Bekaii-Saab.

Traditionally, in the United States physicians have been unlikely to select cetuximab as a frontline therapy due to the associated skin toxicity, Venook says. Moreover, in terms of the chemotherapy backbone used, data from the 80405 trial suggests that FOLFOX was administered for 73% of patients compared with FOLFIRI. In the United States, bevacizumab is most commonly combined with FOLFOX, notes Venook, suggesting a predisposition toward frontline bevacizumab.

The magnitude of benefit seen with these drugs warrants accurate and effective patient selection, Benson states. As a result, the NCCN guidelines now recommend that all patients with mCRC should have tumor tissue genotyped for KRAS and NRAS mutations. Patients with any KRAS or NRAS mutation should not be treated with cetuximab or panitumumab.

To help accelerate extended RAS testing, studies are exploring plasma-based circulating tumor cell tests, Venook notes. The number of patients excluded from treatment with EGFR inhibitors when using the extended RAS testing is substantial. On average, 60% of patients will be ineligible for EGFR inhibitors compared with 40% using traditional KRAS testing, Venook notes. This adds to the treatment puzzle, since a standard option is being taken away for many patients.

Related Videos
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.