Video

Final Thoughts on Optimizing the Treatment of mCRC

For High-Definition, Click

The treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved significantly over the course of 10 years, going from chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy regimens in combination with biologic agents. Results from the recent phase III 80405 study has further solidified this standard of care for patients with metastatic CRC, notes Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD.

In the phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial, frontline therapy with bevacizumab or cetuximab combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI was compared in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. The median overall survival was 29 months in the bevacizumab arm and 29.9 months in the cetuximab arm (HR = 0.925; P = .34). The median PFS was 10.8 months with bevacizumab versus 10.4 months with cetuximab (HR = 1.04; P = .55).

The next step for CRC research will be the exploration of the molecular and biologic mechanisms behind the disease, states Al B. Benson III, MD. Additionally, advances are still required for the treatment of metastatic disease, since the only curative approach currently available remains surgery, Benson notes. The 80405 study did not change the standard of care, it affirmed it, notes Alan P. Venook, MD. However, despite the promising result in this study, it is clear that some patients did not respond. As a result, further research is needed to improve outcomes and potentially achieve cures.

The next generation of clinical trials in CRC will focus on molecular selection of patients and targeted therapies, believes Axel Grothey, MD. The next challenge will be to integrate targeted therapies into clinical trials based on upfront molecular assessment. In this regard, 80405 could serve as the last benchmark trial for the efficacy of established agents in CRC, notes Grothey.

At this point, the treatment of CRC is poised on the edge of an explosion of biologically derived therapies, believes Charles D. Blanke, MD. The next step will be to further personalize care for patients with this disease.

Related Videos
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.