Article

Fluorouracil Is Inappropriate for Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

Author(s):

Updated results from the phase 3 GIM 2 study confirm previous findings showing that fluorouracil should not be a part of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer.

Updated results from the phase 3 GIM 2 study (NCT00433420) confirm previous findings showing that fluorouracil should not be a part of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer.1

From April 2003 to July 2006, investigators randomly assigned 2091 patients with ECOG 0 to 1 status operable, node-positive, breast cancer to 1 of 4 treatment groups:

  • four cycles of standard-interval intravenous (IV) epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2(EC) on day 1 every 3 weeks, followed by 4 cycles of IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 545; q3EC-P)
  • four cycles of IV fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 90 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FEC) on day 1 every 3 weeks, followed by 4 cycles of IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 544; q3FEC-P)
  • the same doses and drugs as the q3EC-P group administered every 2 weeks (n = 502; q2EC-P)
  • the dose-dense FEC-P regimen with the same doses and drugs as the q3FEC-P group administered every 2 weeks (n = 500; q2FEC-P)

Eighty-eight patients enrolled at centers providing only standard interval schedule and were assigned only to q3FEC-P or q3EC-P. As a result, 2091 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of EC-P (n = 1047) versus FEC-P (n = 1044). Investigators included 2003 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of dose-dense (n = 1002) vs standard interval analyses (n = 1001).

At a median follow-up of 15.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.4-16.3), the median disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between FEC-P (17.09 years; 95% CI, 15.51-not reached [NR] and EC-P groups (NR; 95% CI, 17.54-NR; unadjusted HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.98-1.29; log-rank P = .11). However, the median DFS was significantly higher in the dose-dense interval group (95% CI, 17.45-NR) compared with the standard-interval group (NR vs 16.52; 95% CI, 14.24-17.54; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89; P = .0004).

“Updated results from the GIM2 study support that optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer should not include fluorouracil and should use a dose-dense schedule,” investigators wrote.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects (AEs) were neutropenia (37% in the q3EC-P group, 48% in the q3FEC-P group, 10% in q2EC-P group, and 20% in the q2FEC-P group) and alopecia (44%, 47%, 46%, and 48%, respectively). Investigators observed no new grade 3/4 AEs or deaths related to toxic effects during extended follow-up. Nine (2%) patients in the q3EC-P group, 7 (1%) in the q3FEC-P group, 9 (2%) in the q2EC-P group, and 9 (2%) in the q2FEC-P group reported serious treatment-related AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Investigators released 7-year follow-up data from GIM 2 in 2015. DFS at 5 years was 81% (95% CI, 79%-84%) in patients treated every 2 weeks and 76% (95% CI, 74%-79%) in patients treated every 3 weeks (HR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.65-0.92; P = .004). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 94% (95% CI, 93%-96%) in the 2-week arms and 89% (95% CI, 87%-91%) in the 3-week arms (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.84; P = .001).2

Five-year DFS was 78% (95% CI, 75%-81%) in the FEC-P groups and 79% (95% CI, 76%-82%) in the EC-P groups (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.25; P = .561). The 5-year OS rates were 91% (95% CI, 89%-93%) and 92% (95% CI, 90%-94%), respectively (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91-1.46; P = .234).

Investigators found that compared with 3-week dosing, the 2-week dosing schedule was associated with increased rates of grade 3/4 anemia (0.2% vs 1.4%; P = .002), transaminitis (0.4% vs 1.9%; P = .001), and myalgias (1.6% vs 3.1%; P = .019). Two-week dosing was associated with decreased rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia (14.9% vs 44.0%; P <.0001).

The addition of fluorouracil led to increased rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia in patients in the FEC-P group compared with the EC-P group (34.5% vs 24.2%; P <.0001), fever (0.9% vs 0.2%), nausea (4.6% vs 2.7%), and vomiting (3.1% vs 1.4%).

References

  1. Del Mastro L, Poggio F, Blondeaux E, et al. Fluorouracil and dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer (GIM2): end-of-study results from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. Published online November 9, 2022. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00632-5
  2. Del Mastro L, De Placido S, Bruzzi P, et al. Fluorouracil and dose-dense chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer: an open-label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1863-1872. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62048-1
Related Videos
Ruth M. O’Regan, MD
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Sheldon M. Feldman, MD
Dana Zakalik, MD
Alberto Montero, MD, MBA, CPHQ
Jairam Krishnamurthy, MD, FACP
Deena Mary Atieh Graham, MD
Sheldon M. Feldman, MD
Sheldon M. Feldman, MD
In this episode of OncChats: Empowering Community Cancer Care, Dr. Rai emphasizes the importance of community outreach and support for patients with cancer, highlighting the need for holistic care that addresses both physiological and psychological aspects of treatment while reinforcing the value of strong relationships between primary care physicians and specialists.