Press Release
Article
Author(s):
A new study from researchers at Fox Chase Cancer Center has found that some ossifying fibromyxoid tumors are malignant sarcomas.
Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor, or OFMT, is a rare soft-tissue tumor that is usually benign. But a new study from researchers at Fox Chase Cancer Center has found that some of these growths are malignant sarcomas, an aggressive cancer.
Understanding the difference and making a correct diagnosis is crucial to getting patients potentially life-saving treatment, said first and corresponding author Shuanzeng “Sam” Wei, MD, PhD, an Associate Professor in the Department of Pathology and Medical Director of the Clinical Genomics Laboratory at Fox Chase.
While it was previously known that most OFMTs are benign, a small number of cases have been classified as malignant. This study is the first time scientists have concluded that many of these malignant cases represent a different kind of tumor altogether.
“We don’t think it’s the same thing,” said Wei, who conducted the study with colleagues from Fox Chase and researchers from other institutions. “The molecular alteration is different, the morphology is different, and the clinical behavior is different. It’s a different tumor.”
The study was sparked by two cases of malignant OFMT from consultation files at Fox Chase. “I dug into the literature and found that there have been a lot of OFMT cases with PHF1::TFE3 fusion that have malignant behavior,” Wei said.
The research team found that the behavior and morphology of the malignant tumors had more in common with sarcoma than OFMT. They also identified a key genetic difference between the two types of tumors.
Fusion genes involving the gene PHF1 were previously known to be present in OFMT. However, when Wei took a closer look, he found that many sarcoma-like OFMT had PHF1 upstream in the fusion gene (PHF1::TFE3), compared to positioning downstream in all other fusion genes (EP400::PHF1, MEAF6::PHF1, and EPC1::PHF1). This different placement can be used as a genetic marker to correctly identify which tumor is which, he said.
“Molecular testing is very important to get the right diagnosis,” Wei said. “The tumor with PHF1::TFE3 should be treated more aggressively.” Therefore, using the name PHF1::TFE3-positive fibromyxoid sarcoma may be appropriate, he added.
The researchers plan to continue studying the tumors to better understand their differences and how to treat them. “This tumor is rare, so we’re collecting more cases — not only to confirm our findings but also to investigate the treatment options,” Wei said.
The study, “PHF1::TFE3-Positive Fibromyxoid Sarcoma? Report of 2 Cases and Review of 13 Cases of PHF1::TFE3-Positive Ossifying Fibromyxoid Tumor in the Literature,” was published in the American Journal of Clinical Pathology.