Article
Author(s):
Results of the randomized phase II GERCOR trial concluded that patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer saw numerically better survival rates with a gemcitabine-free regimen when compared with a conventional gemcitabine regimen.
Pancreas
Results of the randomized phase II GERCOR trial concluded that patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer saw numerically better survival rates with a gemcitabine-free regimen when compared with a conventional gemcitabine regimen.
When compared with nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane), fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin or gemcitabine led to objective responses in 35% of patients. The (5-FU)/leucovorin group exceeded the prespecified goal of a 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 50%.1 Additionally, patients randomized to the 5-FU/leucovorin regimen had a 12-month survival rate of 48% versus 41% for gemcitabine-containing therapy. The 18-month survival of the 5-FU/leucovorin group was more than twice that of the gemcitabine arm.
Tolerability was comparable between the 2 groups, Olivier Dubreuil, MD, a medical oncologist at Pitie Salpetriere Hospital in Paris, and colleagues reported at the 2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium in San Francisco.
“Results of the [gemcitabine] arm are concordant with those of the phase III MPACT study [that evaluated nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine combination therapy],” the investigators concluded in a poster presentation. “The nab-paclitaxel/5-FU/leucovorin regimen deserves evaluation in a phase III trial.”
The MPACT trial showed that the addition of nab-paclitaxel to gemcitabine improved survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer as compared with gemcitabine alone.2 Translational data suggested that low expression of hENT1 predicts lack of response to gemcitabine,3 providing a rationale to evaluate regimens that do not include gemcitabine.
Dubreuil and colleagues reported findings from the randomized AFUGEM trial that compared the combination of nab-paclitaxel and simplified 5-FU/leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen from the MPACT trial. Patients were randomized 2:1 to nab-paclitaxel/LV5FU2 or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine.
The primary endpoint of the trial was a targeted 4-month PFS of 50% in the experimental arm. If the trial met the endpoint, the nab-paclitaxel/LV5FU2 regimen was considered worthwhile for evaluation in a phase III trial.
Data analysis included 114 patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. The patients had a median age of 66 and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. About 37% of the patients had 2 or more metastatic sites, and 75% had liver metastases. About 13% of the patients had undergone surgical resection.
The LV5FU2 regimen had tolerability that was at least comparable to the gemcitabine regimen, including rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia (23.3% vs 23.7%), febrile neutropenia (8.2% vs 5.3%), anemia (5.5% vs 10.5%), thrombocytopenia (0% vs 15.8%), mucositis (9.6% vs 2.6%), diarrhea (12.3% vs 7.9%), fatigue (21.9% vs 21.1%), paresthesia (19.2% vs 10.5%), elevated ALT (4.1% vs 13.2%), and elevated AST (5.5% vs 13.2%).
Dubreuil and colleagues reported that about 80% of patients in both groups received the planned number of cycles of therapy at the specified dosages.
The objective response rate was 35.1% with LV5FU2 and 36% with the gemcitabine regimen. The 4-month PFS was 55.6% with LV5FU2 and 54% with gemcitabine. Median PFS was 5.9 months with LV5FU2 and 4.9 months with gemcitabine (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.52-1.20).
With a median follow-up of 16.9 months, the LV5FU2 group had a median overall survival of 11.4 months compared with 9.2 months with the gemcitabine regimen. Overall survival rates favored the LV5FU2 group at 12 (48% vs 41%) and 18 months (34% vs 13%).