Article

KEYNOTE-189 Analysis Supports Pembrolizumab/Chemo as a Frontline Standard in Metastatic NSCLC

Five-year follow-up data from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 trial further confirms the use of first-line pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and platinum improves long-term survival outcomes for patients with treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer.

Marina Chiara Garassino, MD

Marina Chiara Garassino, MD

Five-year follow-up data from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 trial (NCT02578680) further confirms the use of first-line pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in combination with pemetrexed (Alimta) and platinum improves long-term survival outcomes for patients with treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to Marina Chiara Garassino, MD.

Updated analysis presented at the 2022 ESMO Congress showed that patients treated with pembrolizumab maintained a prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with those in the placebo arm.

Median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI, 19.5-24.5) in the pembrolizumab arm vs 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.7-13.6) in the placebo group (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50-0.72). Five-year OS rates were 19.4% and 11.3% respectively. Additionally, median PFS increased from 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.7-5.5) in the placebo arm to 9 months (95% CI, 8.1-10.4) with pembrolizumab (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.42-0.60).

The toxicity profile was consistent with previous findings, with 52.3% of patients in the pembrolizumab arm experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse effects (AE) vs 42.1% of patients in the placebo arm.

Additionally, patients who completed a full 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (n = 57) exhibited a durable response, with a 3-year OS rate of 71.9% and an overall response rate of 86% (95% CI, 74.2%-93.7%).

“The results showed that at least [19.4%] of patients [treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy have] survived for 5 years,” said Garassino, who is a professor of medicine, hematology and oncology in the Department of Medicine, and director of the Thoracic Oncology Program at the University of Chicago in Illinois. “When I started my career, that was not possible. We [also] know [that] the [treatment regimen] was completed in a good [number] of patients without [AEs] leading to treatment discontinuation. [That’s very] good news.”

In an interview with OncLive®, Garassino discussed unique aspects of the KEYNOTE-189 trial design, key findings from the 5-year follow-up analysis, and the positive effect of chemoimmunotherapy combinations on patient outcomes.

OncLive®: Please provide some background on the initial effects of the KEYNOTE-189 trial.

Garassino: KEYNOTE-189 was practice-changing for patients with advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC. [It] was a [randomized] phase 3 trial [comparing] the combination of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab [with placebo plus] chemotherapy. At the time, [standard chemotherapy] was a combination of cisplatin or carboplatin and pemetrexed.[The trial] enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations.

What was the rationale for evaluating the addition of pembrolizumab to standard pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC?

Chemotherapy can remove the myeloid-suppressor components, [while also inducing] immunogenic cell death. [This] activates the T cells, [bolstering] the efficacy of immunotherapy. [We knew that] chemotherapy and immunotherapy work well together, so [we wanted to investigate the efficacy of this combination] in the first-line setting.

What is important to note about the trial design?

When the trial was conceived, immunotherapy was already present in the [treatment] landscape of NSCLC. [Because of this], crossover [from placebo to anti–PD-L1 therapy] was allowed. The [effective crossover rate] was 57%, [which] means that [118] patients received [subsequent] immunotherapy. [This is important because] the results [confirm an] increase [in] OS [benefit despite the] 57% of patients [who] received that immunotherapy as a second-line treatment.

What key findings from the 5-year follow-up analysis stood out to you?

[During our follow-up analysis], there [was] a group of patients who completed the [full] 35 cycles of [chemoimmunotherapy, which is equivalent to] two years of treatment. The treatment was well tolerated [in] these patients and [AEs were consistent with] what we had [observed] in the past. [This indicates that] the treatment is feasible for 2 years. For those patients who [completed] 2 years of treatment, there was [also] a very high life expectancy. [In fact,] a huge proportion of patients were still alive 3 years [after completion] and 5 years [from randomization].

We thought [there might be] a crossing of the [Kaplan-Meier] curves at the [time of cut-off]. [However, we saw that] the benefit of the chemotherapy and immunotherapy is very well maintained, [and that the] tail of the curves with the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy [began to plateau]. That is something that we really wanted to see in this trial.

How might these updated findings affect expectations for future treatment for this patient population?

KEYNOTE-189 already represented the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC and nonsquamous histology, and [immunotherapy] is already [prolific in most treatment strategies.]Clearly, we have to [keep raising] the bar [for patient survival, but] the [effect of this] treatment is visible. I hope that research [in this area] will [continue], and that patient survival [rates will] exceed [current] expectations [even] more than what we can see now.

Reference

Garassino MC, Gadgeel SM, Speranza G, et al. KEYNOTE-189 5-year update: first-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + pemetrexed (pem) and platinum vs placebo (pbo) + pem and platinum for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 7):S992-S993. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1101

Related Videos
Alec Watson, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Nosha Farhadfar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Suresh Senan, MRCP, FRCR, PhD, full professor, treatment and quality of life, full professor, cancer biology and immunology, full professor, radiation oncology, professor, clinical experimental radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Alison Schram, MD
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses molecular testing challenges in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the multidisciplinary management of NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of pathologists in molecular testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of RNA and other testing considerations for detecting NRG1 and other fusions in solid tumors.