Commentary
Article
Author(s):
Tatyana Feldman, MD, highlights updated data for liso-cel in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
Durable responses seen with lisocabtagene maraleucel (Breyanzi; liso-cel) after longer-term follow-up of the phase 1/2 TRANSCEND CLL 004 trial (NCT03331198) signal the agent’s viability as a much-needed later-line option for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have exhausted all available regimens, according to Tatyana Feldman, MD.
Updated results from a 24-month median follow-up analysis of the TRANSCEND CLL 004 trial were presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, and showed a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 20% (95% CI, 10%-34%) in patients who were treated with liso-cel at the target dose of 100 x 106 T cells (n = 50) and had experienced progression on BTK inhibition and venetoclax (Venclexta) failure.1 The overall response rate (ORR) with the agent was 44% (95% CI, 30%-59%) per independent review committee assessment. Moreover, patients achieved sustained, undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) rates of 64% in blood (95% CI, 49%-77%).
Previously reported data from the primary analysis of this trial supported the FDA’s decision to grant priority review to a supplemental biologics license application seeking to expand the indication of liso-cel to patients with CLL/SLL and prior exposure to a BTK and BCL-2 inhibitor.2
“The fact that we have such a long duration of CRs, which are basically not reached, as well as a very [encouraging] duration of partial response [PR] with [liso-cel is encouraging,]” said Feldman, who is a hematologist and director of the T Cell Lymphoma Program at John Theurer Cancer Center, in Hackensack, New Jersey.“[Liso-cel] is a very important next-line therapy, which should be adopted by the community, particularly for the patients who progress after BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors.”
In an interview with OncLive®, Feldman discussed the rationale for evaluating the efficacy of liso-cel in CLL/SLL following progression on BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors; reported updated efficacy findings for this agent from the TRANSCEND 004 study; and highlighted the potential impact of liso-cel if approved as an option in the CLL treatment arsenal.
Feldman: We have excellent treatment options for CLL, which include BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors, which have changed outcomes for patients with CLL. Suddenly, [many of] my patients are surviving, and no one is running out of options. However, we’re [now] accumulating patients who started to relapse after long-term, or [even shorter-term,] treatment with a BTK inhibitor or BCL-2 inhibitor. Even though we have a lot of options, one of the important ones [for use post-progression is liso-cel, which was assessed in the] TRANSCEND 004 study.
Long-term follow-up [data from] TRANSCEND 004 was presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, and [findings from] the primary analysis [were presented] at [the 2023 ASCO meeting. In the most recent analysis], the median follow-up was [23.5] months. TRANSCEND 004 evaluated liso-cel, which is a CD19-targeted CAR T-cell [therapy], in patients with relapsed CLL/SLL.
This [analysis featured] a cohort of patients who must have [progressed on] a BTK inhibitor and venetoclax, so they were double-refractory patients. This is particularly a difficult population to treat, as their median overall survival [OS] is quite short. Patients received the study drug at 2 dose levels. The second dose level was considered the [recommended dose for] all patients. There were also 2 cohorts, 1 [comprising] all patients and another cohort just for patients [previously exposed to] venetoclax and BTK [inhibition]. The overall efficacy cohort had 88 patients, 50 [of whom were] double refractory.
The results are quite impressive. We saw an ORR of approximately 40% and a CR rate of 20%, which was the primary end point. Importantly, [the rate of patients with] undetectable MRD in blood was [64% at dose level 2]. As this analysis showed, that translates into meaningful DOR that was NR, and partial responses [were seen in 25 patients] for the total cohort and 12 [patients in] the double-refractory cohort. [For] OS, there is a significant signal [of benefit], although we need more data to [confirm this.] OS was NR in patients who [responded] and [10.7] months for non-responders.
From a toxicity standpoint, there were no novel safety signals. [Any-grade] cytokine release syndrome and [neurologic events occurred at] incidences of 85% and 45%, respectively. However, most of [these events were] grade 1 or 2 and easily manageable. This may be the next approved intervention in the armamentarium for patients with CLL.
Question number 1 is whether some of those patients are cured. There is the potential for some of these patients to be cured and never require any therapy [again]. For most of these patients, it means resetting the clock. It means that the patients who have no [other] options at this point will have another couple of years of worry-free life [as] novel drug development is ongoing, and a couple of years later, we’ll have something new. That’s what we’re really seeing in the CLL space. We have patients who live normal, productive lives with a good quality of life, just moving from one agent to another agent. We may not be curing the disease, but we’re clearly making major headway.
My interest is in T-cell lymphomas, so I’m pleased to see that the field is developing novel therapies. Two important abstracts were presented [at the meeting]: one is a phase 1 trial exploring valemetostat tosilate [Ezharmia] and the [other is the] phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 trial [(NCT04703192) of] the same agent. Valemetostat is an EZH1/EZH2 selective inhibitor. EZH2 mutations are well-known in B-cell lymphomas. In T-cell lymphomas there may not necessarily be increased mutations [in EZH2], but [there] definitely [is] increased signaling, which leads to an antiapoptotic epigenetic landscape in the cell. An EZH1/2 inhibitor reverses [the tumor environment] back to an antiproliferative and anticancer [landscape.]
There were [2] T-cell cohorts [in the trial]. These included [patients with] relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma and [those with] adult T-cell leukemia [(ATL), respectively, the latter of] which is a particularly difficult leukemia to treat with a poor prognosis. [We saw] patients with ATL having overall responses of [approximately] 50% and PRs of approximately 30%. [For patients with] multiple relapses, that’s unheard of. We see a differential [in patients] with the T-follicular helper [(TFH) phenotype] of PTCL, [as these patients are] doing a little bit better [than other subtypes]. Another important [result from] this trial was that the duration of remission is long, which is quite significant in this field.