Article

Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin Combo Misses OS End Point in Phase 3 SCLC Trial

Author(s):

December 3, 2020 - Lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin failed to significantly improve overall survival versus physician’s choice of topotecan or cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine in patients with small cell lung cancer who progressed after 1 previous platinum-containing line of treatment, missing the primary end point of the phase 3 ATLANTIS trial.

Robert Iannone MD, MSCE, executive vice president of research and development of Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Robert Iannone MD, MSCE

Lurbinectedin (Zepzelca) plus doxorubicin failed to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus physician’s choice of topotecan or cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (CAV) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who progressed after 1 previous platinum-containing line of treatment, missing the primary end point of the phase 3 ATLANTIS trial (NCT02566993).1

Although the trial did not meet the prespecified criteria of statistical significance with regard to OS in the intent-to-treat population with lurbinectedin/doxorubicin versus the control, no adverse impact on OS was observed in the investigational arm, according to Jazz Pharmaceuticals, plc and PharmaMar. Notably, secondary and subgroup analyses were found to favor the combination regimen over the control. However, no additional hypotheses were formally evaluated based on the trial design and single-agent lurbinectedin was not examined.

Safety findings from the trial proved to be comparable with the known toxicity profile of single-agent lurbinectedin and no new signals were reported. Regarding grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse effects and deaths from toxicity, safety and tolerability favored the investigational arm over the control arm; this was also true with regard to dose reductions and treatment discontinuations from toxicity.

Data from the trial will be shared at a future medical conference and will be discussed with the appropriate regulatory authorities.

“Bringing [lurbinectedin] to the US market earlier this year alongside our partner, PharmaMar, was an important advance for adults with metastatic SCLC, an aggressive disease with a historically poor prognosis,” Robert Iannone MD, MSCE, executive vice president of research and development of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, stated in a press release. “While the combination of lurbinectedin and doxorubicin did not achieve the primary end point in this study, the overall results support the activity and tolerability of lurbinectedin in this line of therapy. We look forward to the further development of lurbinectedin in SCLC and other tumors, both as monotherapy and in combination.”

A total of 613 patients were enrolled to the multicenter, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial between September 2016 and July 2018. To be eligible for enrollment, patients had to be 18 years of age or older, have a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of limited or extensive-stage SCLC, and have progressed on 1 previous platinum-containing regimen. Patients also needed to have a chemotherapy-free interval of 30 days or longer.

In the trial, participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either the lurbinectedin/doxorubicin combination or physician’s choice of topotecan or CAV. Notably, patients in the investigational arm were administered lurbinectedin at a dose of 2.0 mg/m2, which is lower than the 3.2 mg/m2 dose that is currently approved by the FDA.

The primary end point of the trial was OS, while key secondary end points included the difference in OS for those treated with the investigational doublet versus those who received CAV, OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in those with or without central nervous system (CNS) involvement, PFS per independent review committee (IRC), antitumor activity demonstrated by objective response rate per IRC, and duration of response to treatment per IRC.

Patients were stratified based on chemotherapy-free interval, their ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 or 2), CNS involvement (yes vs no), previous immunotherapy exposure (PD-1 or PD-L1) and investigator preference (topotecan vs CAV).

Results from a previous phase 1 trial in patients with relapsed SCLC demonstrated that when lurbinectedin was delivered at a flat dose of 4.0 mg on day 1 every 3 weeks in combination with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2, the combination had impressive antitumor activity, particularly when used in the second-line setting.2

Eight percent (n = 2) of patients with relapsed SCLC experienced a complete response to treatment, while 50% (n = 13) experienced a partial response. When delivered in the second-line setting, the combination elicited a response rate of 91.7% in those with sensitive disease and 33.3% in those with resistant disease. The median PFS with the doublet was 5.8 months and 3.5 months, respectively. When used in the third-line setting, the combination resulted in a 20.0% response rate with a median PFS of 1.2 months in patients with resistant disease.

The combination was also found to have manageable toxicity. The main adverse effect (AE) reported was transient and reversible myelosuppression, which included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia, although this toxicity was found to be manageable via either dose adjustment or the use of colony-stimulating factors.

Other commonly reported AEs included fatigue (79%), nausea or vomiting (58%), decreased appetite (53%), mucositis (53%), alopecia (42%), diarrhea or constipation (42%), asymptomatic creatinine (68%), increased alanine aminotransferase (42%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (32%).

References

  1. Jazz Pharmaceuticals and PharmaMar announce results of ATLANTIS phase 3 study evaluating Zepzelca in combination with doxorubicin for patients with small cell lung cancer following one prior platinum-containing line. News release. Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc and PharmaMar. December 3, 2020. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://bit.ly/39EFUXB.
  2. Calvo E, Moreno V, Flynn M, et al. Antitumor activity of lurbinectedin (PMO1183) and doxorubicin in relaped small-cell lung cancer: results from a phase 1 study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(10):2559-2566. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx357
Related Videos
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.