News

Article

Lurbinectedin Plus Irinotecan Is Safe, Prolongs Responses in High-Risk, Pretreated SCLC

Key Takeaways

  • Lurbinectedin and irinotecan combination achieved a 43.6% overall response rate in high-risk SCLC patients.
  • Median duration of response was 7.1 months, with a median progression-free survival of 4.7 months.
SHOW MORE

Clinical benefit generated from treatment with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was noted across sensitive and resistant patient populations with SCLC.

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD

Second-line treatment with lurbinectedin and irinotecan displayed a favorable risk/benefit profile and produced high, durable response rates in high-risk patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), particularly those with a chemotherapy treatment-free interval (CTFI) of more than 30 days, according to data from the dose-expansion portion of the phase 1/2 study PM1183-A-014-15 study (NCT02611024).1

Findings presented during the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting showed that the doublet produced a 43.6% (95% CI, 33.7%-53.8%) overall response rate by independent review committee (IRC) in the overall population (n = 101), and the median duration of response (DOR) was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.4). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.7) and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months (95% CI, 7.8-13.4). Additionally, the OS rate at 12 months was 43.4% (95% CI, 33.4%-53.4%).

Further assessment of efficacy according to CTFI interval revealed ORRs of 25.0% (95% CI, 14.0%-38.9%), 63.3% (95% CI, 48.3%-76.6%), and 52.7% (95% CI, 40.7%-64.4%) in patients with a CTFI less than 90 days (n = 52), 90 days or greater (n = 49), or greater than 30 days (n = 74), respectively. The median DOR at each respective interval was 6.9 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.6), 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.4-12.4), and 7.6 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.7). The median PFS at each interval was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.0), 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.3), and 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.2); median OS was 7.5 months (3.5-8.8), 14.0 months (10.1-21.4), and 12.7 months (9.1-14.1). The 12-month OS rates for these respective groups were 25.3% (95% CI, 13.2%-37.5%), 63.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-77.2%), and 52.0% (95% CI, 40.3%-63.8%).

“The study demonstrated promising response rates, with a high proportion of patients experiencing prolonged DORs,” lead study author Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, chair of the Medical Oncology Department at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and associate professor at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain, and colleagues, wrote in a poster presentation of the data. “Particularly notable results were observed in a population characterized by poor prognosis, primarily determined by known prognostic factors such as CTFI, central nervous system [CNS] involvement, and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] levels.”

Lurbinectedin is approved by the FDA and other global regulatory agencies for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic SCLC who have experienced disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, and is considered a standard of care in this space. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy between lurbinectedin and irinotecan, supporting efforts to further evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of this combined approach.

PM1183-A-014-15 evaluated the combination in pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors. In the phase 1b portion of this study, the regimen produced positive outcomes, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was established as 2 mg/m2 of lurbinectedin on day 1 plus 75 mg/m2 of irinotecan on days 1 and 8. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks along with granulocyte colony–stimulating factor prophylaxis.

Accordingly, an expansion cohort of 101 patients with second-line SCLC was initiated. The combination was administered at the RP2D to patients with confirmed SCLC who had progressed after 1 platinum-containing regimen with or without a prior anti–PD-1 agent. Patients had controlled brain metastases and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. The study’s primary end point was ORR as assessed by an IRC.

The median age of patients on the study was 63.0 years (range, 45-77), and 41.6% were 65 years of age or older. The majority of patients were male (60.4%), White (98.0%), had an ECOG performance status of 1 (76.2%), and had extended-stage SCLC at diagnosis (91.1%). The median time from diagnosis was 7.7 months (range, 2.5-21.6), the time from last disease progression was 0.9 months (range, 0.2-3.0), and the time from the start of the last prior treatment to radiological progression was 5.6 months (range, 1.0-13.7). Patients had a median of 4 sites involved (range, 1-8). CNS or liver involvement was observed in 28.7% and 38.6% of patients, respectively. Abnormal LDH was observed in 56.4% of patients, and 40.6% had at least 1 lesion greater than 50 mm.

Over half of patients (54.5%) received prior radiotherapy, and 41.6% received prior immunotherapy. Prior carboplatin- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy was administered to 78.2% and 21.8% of patients, respectively. The median CTFI was 85 days (range, 0-323), with 48.5% experiencing a CTFI of 90 days or more. Among these patients, 38.6% were categorized as sensitive (CTFI between 90 to 180 days) and 9.9% were very sensitive (CTFI greater than 180 days). For those with a CTFI less than 90 days (51.4%), 26.7% were refractory (CTFI between 0 and 30 days) and 24.8% were resistant (CTFI between 31 and 89 days).

On their last prior platinum-based regimen, 68.3% of patients achieved a partial response, 3.0% had a complete response, 6.9% achieved stable disease, and 11.9% experienced PD.

Patients underwent a median of 6 cycles (range, 1-34) of treatment with lurbinectedin and irinotecan, and 29.7% of patients received more than 10 treatment cycles.

The safety profile of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was deemed manageable, with a low percentage of treatment discontinuations (3.0%) and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Any-grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were reported in 99.0% of patients, 70.3% of which were grade 3 or higher. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs were observed in 86.1% of patients. Any-grade serious AEs occurred in 51.5% of patients, 47.5% of which were grade 3 or higher. Any-grade treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 26.7% of patients, of which 23.8% were grade 3 or higher. TRAEs led to dose delays or reductions in 31.7% and 50.5% of patients, respectively.

Drug-related or unknown AEs occurring in 5% of more of patients included fatigue (any-grade, 84.2%; grade 3/4, 18.8%), diarrhea (70.3%; 19.8%), nausea (52.5%; 5.0%), decreased appetite (42.6%; 4.0%), vomiting (35.6%; 6.9%), febrile neutropenia (10.9%; 10.9%), constipation (10.9%; 0.0%), weight decrease (9.9%; 0.0%), mucosal inflammation (6.9%; 0.0%), dysgeusia (5.9%; 0.0%), and arthralgia (5.0%; 1.0%).

Laboratory abnormalities observed included anemia (grade ≥1, 97.0%; grade 3/4, 28.7%), neutropenia (75.2%; 53.5%), lymphopenia (86.1%; 37.6%), thrombocytopenia (55.4%; 11.9%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (52.5%; 6.9%), alanine aminotransferase increase (63.4%; 7.9%), total bilirubin increase (21.8%; 1.0%), creatinine increase (89.1%; 1.0%), and creatine phosphokinase increase (8.9%; 2.0%).

“These encouraging results reinforce the rationale for including this combination as an experimental arm in the ongoing pivotal phase 3 LAGOON trial [NCT05153239] in relapsed SCLC with CTFI greater than 30 days,” investigators concluded.

Disclosures: Dr Paz-Ares reports the following disclosures: a leadership role with ALTUM Sequencing and Stab Therapeutics; stock and other ownership interests with ALTUM Sequencing and Stab Therapeutics; receiving honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Serono, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda; serving in a consulting or advisory role for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda; serving on a speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech; receiving institutional research funding from AztraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb MSD, Pfizer, and PharmaMar, other institutional relationships with Amgen, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Roche, Sanofi, SERVIER

Reference

Paz-Ares L, Gonzalez AF, Navarro A, et al. Efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin (LUR) with irinotecan (IRI) in patients (Pts) with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Results from a phase 2 expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2024, 42(16): 8094. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.8094

Related Videos
Paolo Caimi, MD
Jennifer Scalici, MD
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Victor Moreno, MD, PhD
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.