Article

Lutetium 177 PSMA-617 Following Radium-223 Is Active and Safe in mCRPC

Author(s):

Sequencing treatment with Lutetium 177 PSMA-617 after radium-223 was safe and well tolerated and demonstrated similar overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer regardless of whether they received 177Lu-PSMA-617 within 6 months or after 6 months of completing radium-223.

Sequencing treatment with Lutetium 177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) after radium-223 was safe and well tolerated and demonstrated similar overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) regardless of whether they received 177Lu-PSMA-617 within 6 months or after 6 months of completing radium-223, according to retrospective data from the RALU trial presented at the 2023 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

“The rationale for the RALU study is that the radium and lutetium PSMA- 617 have both demonstrated overall survival benefit and acceptable safety in patients with mCRPC,” said Kambiz Rahbar, MD, department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Münster in Germany, said while presenting the findings at the 2023 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium. “The question RALU set out to ask is whether it is safe to sequence two radionuclide therapies, an alpha and a beta emitter, in patients with mCRPC.”

Patient Characteristics

The study analyzed outcomes from patients with mCRPC who were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 within 6 months of radium-223 treatment (group 1; n=42) and those who were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 6 or more months after radium-223 treatment (group 2; n=90).

Median age was 72 and 74 years in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Regarding performance status, 57% and 63%, respectively, had and EGOG status of 1, while 43% and 37% had an ECOG status of 2. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were 366 and 268 ng/ml, and median alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values were 133 and 149 U/L.

Forty percent and 64% of patients in group 1 and group 2, respectively, had 4 or more prior life-extending therapies, with all patients having prior radium-223 treatment. The most common other therapies were: abiraterone (60% in group 1 and 77% in group 2), enzalutamide (50% and 78%), docetaxel (71% and 76%) and cabazitaxel (17% and 26%).

Visceral metastasis was present in 24% of patients in group 1 and 29% of patients in group 2 before undergoing therapy with 177Lu-PSMA.

RALU Outcomes

Study outcomes showed that between the start of 177Lu-PSMA therapy to 30 days after the last dose, 71% and 82% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, experience any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), with the most common being fatigue (12% and 7%), nausea (12% and 8%) and dry mouth (7% and 18%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs, excluding laboratory abnormalities, were experienced in 36% of patients in group 1 and 24% of patients in group 2.

Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2% of patients in group 1 and 4% of patients in group 2, with TRAEs leading to dose delays in 10% and 9% of patients in group 1 and 2, respectively.

Survival outcomes showed no statistically significant difference in median OS between group 1 and group 2. In group 1, median OS from the start of 177Lu-PSMA treatment was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.8-19.9), while it was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.0-15.9) in group 2.

During therapy with 177Lu-PSMA, PSA responses of 50% or more occurred in 53% of patients in group 1 and 39% of patients in group 2, with ALP responses of 30% or more occurring in 28% and 14% of patients, respectively.

“In conclusion, we can say that these data can show that treating patients with lutetium within 6 months of completing radium was clinically feasible and well tolerated.”

Reference:

Rahbar K, Essler M, Eiber M, et. al. Time interval between radium‑223 (223Ra) therapy and Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) treatment and outcomes in the RALU study. Presented at: 2023 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium. February 16-18, 2023. San Francisco, CA.

Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center