News

Article

Lutetium Lu 177 Vipivotide Tetraxetan Plus Enzalutamide Elicits PSA-PFS Improvement in mCRPC

Author(s):

Treatment with the combination of lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan and enzalutamide led to an improvement in prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival vs enzalutamide alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Metastatic Castration-Resistant  Prostate Cancer | Image Credit:  © SciePro - stock.adobe.com

Metastatic Castration-Resistant
Prostate Cancer | Image Credit:
© SciePro - stock.adobe.com

Treatment with the combination of lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (Pluvicto; formerly 177Lu-PSMA-617) and enzalutamide (Xtandi) led to an improvement in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) vs enzalutamide alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), according to interim findings from the phase 2 ENZA-p study (NCT04419402) presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress.1

“This is the first randomized trial combining an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, enzalutamide, with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan. It provides strong evidence for an enhanced anti-cancer effect with the combination of enzalutamide and lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan based on the primary end point, PSA-PFS,” said Louise Emmett, MD, FRACP, during an oral presentation of the findings at the meeting. Emmett is the director of theranostics and nuclear medicine at St. Vincent’s Hospital in Sydney, Australia.

Data from the study showed a median PSA-PFS of 13 months with the combination therapy compared with 7.8 months with enzalutamide alone (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.63; P = .00001). Median radiographic PFS was 16 months with the combination therapy compared with 12 months for enzalutamide alone (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01).1

Further, PSA 50% (decrease ≥50% from baseline) response rates were 93% (77/83) in the combination arm, compared with 68% (54/79) for enzalutamide alone (P < .001). PSA 90% (decrease ≥90% from baseline) response rates were 78% (65/83) among those in the combination arm compared with 37% (29/79) among those who received enzalutamide alone (P < .001).1

In total, the ENZA-p study included 162 patients with mCRPC. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 160 mg of enzalutamide alone (n = 79) or 160 mg enzalutamide plus 7.5 GBq lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (n = 83) delivered in 2 or 4 doses. Those included in the combination therapy arm underwent 2 doses with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan with SPECT with 2 additional doses for those with persistent PSMA-positive disease detected at 92-day follow-up. In total, 81% of patients in the combination arm received 4 doses of lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan.1

Emmett commented in the presentation, “We used 2 to 4 doses of Lu-PSMA in the ENZA-p trial, but 2 to 6 doses may further improve progression-free survival, particularly in those patients who have a high proportion of androgen persistent clones.”

The primary end point of the study was PSA-PFS. Secondary end points included radiological PFS, PSA50%, PSA90%, adverse effects (AEs), and overall survival (OS).2 Median follow-up among all patients included in the study was 20 months.

Serious AEs were reported in 35% (28/79) of patients who received enzalutamide alone, compared with 33% (27/81) of patients who received enzalutamide with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan. Grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported among 4% (3/79) of patients in the enzalutamide monotherapy arm, compared with 6% (8/81) of patients in the combination arm.1

In the presentation conclusion, Emmett noted, “I think this is going to become more important as we move this radiation treatment earlier in the disease paradigm to hormone sensitive prostate cancer. It [has] the potential to reduce toxicity by only administering if persistent PSMA-avid disease is present on the PSMA-PET or SPECT images.”

Emmett also added that there is planned follow-up of PFS and OS in the study until July 2024.

References

  1. Enzalutamide and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in poor-risk, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A randomised, phase II trial: ENZA-p (ANZUP 1901). Presented at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress. October 20-24, 2023. Madrid, Spain. Abstract LBA84
  2. National Institutes of Health US National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov. Enzalutamide with Lu PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide along in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p). Last updated June 15, 2023. Accessed October 20, 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04419402
Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center