Video

Measuring Therapeutic Response in Colon Cancer

For High-Definition, Click

Given the recent advances in treatment being made for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), it could be time to develop a new criteria to assess how a patient is responding to therapy, suggests Daniel Haller MD. Measures such as depth of response and longitudinality of response can provide practical information about whether or not to continue therapy, he adds. These approaches may explain, for instance, why the FIRE-3 study showed an improvement in overall survival without the typically prolonged progression-free survival.

It’s time to move beyond RECIST, adds John Marshall, MD. If you look at a radiology report without looking at the actual disc from a CT scan, you’ll often make the wrong clinical decision, he emphasizes. New approaches to assess responses to treatment in CRC are under development, including molecular and functional imaging techniques.

Related Videos
Eunice S. Wang, MD
Marcella Ali Kaddoura, MD
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses molecular testing challenges in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the multidisciplinary management of NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of pathologists in molecular testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of RNA and other testing considerations for detecting NRG1 and other fusions in solid tumors.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the prevalence of NRG1 fusions in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, chief, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Cedric Pobel, MD
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine