News

Article

Neoadjuvant Niraparib Plus Dostarlimab Generates pCRs in BRCA+ ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • Imlunestrant improved PFS in ESR1-mutated breast cancer but not significantly in the overall population compared to standard endocrine therapy.
  • Combining imlunestrant with abemaciclib significantly enhanced PFS across all patients, regardless of ESR1 mutation status.
SHOW MORE

Treatment with preoperative niraparib plus dostarlimab generated responses among patients with BRCA-mutant, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

Breast cancer | Image Credit: © Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Breast cancer | Image Credit:
© Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Patients with BRCA-mutated estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (n = 18) achieved pathologic complete responses (pCR) and minimal residual disease following treatment with neoadjuvant niraparib (Zejula) plus dostarlimab-gxly (Jemperli), according to findings from arm C of the phase 2 TBCRC-056 trial (NCT04584255) presented during the 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.1

Data showed that the pathological complete response rate (pCR) was 16.7% (90% CI, 4.7%-37.7%). Additionally, the residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/I rate was 44.4%, RCB-I was 27.8%, RCB-II was 22.2%, RCB-III was 22.2%, and those given additional neoadjuvant therapy had a response rate of 11.1%.

“Given the activity of preoperative PD-1 inhibition for ER-positive breast cancer, additional evaluation of targeted non-chemotherapy approaches is of great interest in this patient population,” Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director of Clinical Research and Institute Physician at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, said during the presentation.

Investigators of arm C evaluated 18 patients with ER–positive/HER2-negative disease who were given niraparib plus dostarlimab for 18 weeks. Niraparib was given at 200 mg by mouth daily, and dostarlimab was given at 500 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Patients were enrolled between April 2021 and May 2024.

To be eligible for treatment, patients needed to have germline BRCA1/2 mutations or germline PALB2 mutations, HER2-negative disease, stage I to III disease, and a tumor of 1 cm or more. Between arms A, B, and C, 64 patients were enrolled.

The median patient age was 41.8 years old, and 77.8% were White. At diagnosis, most patients had stage II disease (44.4%) followed by stage I (38.9%) and stage IIIA (16.7%). Of note, the majority of patients had a tumor grade of II (61.1%). A germline BRCA1 mutation was observed in 27.8% of patients vs 72.2% with BRCA2.

Regarding treatment exposure, 18 have completed therapy and received surgery. Prior to surgery, 2 patients were given additional neoadjuvant therapy, 83.3% completed 6 cycles of niraparib, and 61.1% completed 6 cycles of dostarlimab.

Regarding toxicity, the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse effects included rash (27.8%), alanine transaminase increase (16.7%), and nausea (5.6%).

A total of 12 patients had evaluable paired basal-like (BL) and C2 stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs). There was an 11.9% increase in sTILs with exposure to therapy at 3 weeks. The mean increase was 11.9% to 23.8% (P = .09).

There were 17 patients with evaluable BL sTILs. For patients with higher sTILs, there was an association with pCR (P = .04) and a continuous overall response of 1.10 (90% CI, 1.01-1.20). For patients with sTILs that were higher at BL, there was an association with RCB0-I response (P = .09) and continuous OR of 1.08 (90% CI, 1.00-1.17).

“Increased baseline sTILs was associated with pathologic response at surgery,” Mayer said.

Regarding the background for this research, the pCR rates observed in those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have approximately been 50% for those receiving neoadjuvant PARP inhibitor therapy. Mayer noted that further research regarding TNBC was underway.

Although previous data suggested that adding an anti-PD-L1 therapy to a PARP inhibitor did not increase activity in patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer, there may be room for this combination in less immunosuppressed early-stage settings.

“Additional exploration of the immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment may help fully realize the impact of combining immunologic approaches with PARP inhibition,” Mayer concluded.

Reference

Mayer EL, Graham N, Leon-Ferre RA, et al. TBCRC 056: a phase II study of neoadjuvant niraparib with dostarlimab for patients with BRCA- or PALB2-mutated breast cancer: results from the ER+/HER2- cohort. Presented at the 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; San Antonio, TX, December 10-13, 2024. RF3-01


Related Videos
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center
Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, director, Translational Research Integration, UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
John M. Burke, MD