Commentary

Article

Neoadjuvant SHR-A1811 Produces pCRs in Early HER2+ Breast Cancer

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Jun-Jie Li, MD, discusses the efficacy of neoadjuvant SHR-A1811, a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Breast Cancer | Image Credit: © Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Breast Cancer
| Image Credit: © Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Although the efficacy of standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment strategies has been established in the treatment of patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant data for the antibody-drug conjugate SHR-A1811 highlight the potential role for the use of this class of agents in this setting, according to Jun-Jie Li, MD.

Findings from the phase 2 FASCINATE-N trial (NCT05582499) presented at the 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 63.2% (95% CI, 53.9%-71.8%) with SHR-A1811 monotherapy (n = 87). Patients treated with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib (n = 88) experienced a pCR rate of 62.5% (95% CI, 53.2%-71.1%), and those randomly assigned to PCbHP (nab-paclitaxel [Abraxane], carboplatin, trastuzumab [Herceptin], and pertuzumab [Perjeta]; n = 90) achieved a pCR rate of 64.4% (95% CI, 55.3%-72.8%).

“We found that the 3 [regimens] had a similar efficacy [data],” Li said.

In an interview with OncLive®, Li provided background on SHR-A1811, explained the rationale for exploring the use of ADCs in the neoadjuvant setting, and detailed the significance of the FASCINATE-N findings.

Li is a surgical oncologist and the associate chief of the breast cancer department at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center in China.

OncLive: What is the mechanism of action of SHR-A1811?

Li: SHR-A1811 is a third-generation anti-HER2 ADC. It's composed of trastuzumab, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload. The drug:antibody ratio is 6. Currently, we don't have any results [on] another third-generation ADC in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.

The whole world is now waiting for [results] from the [phase 3] DESTINY-Breast11 trial [NCT05113251] evaluating [neoadjuvant] fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki [T-DXd; Enhertu], but [DESTINY-Breast11] has a bit of different trial design. It's a phase 3 trial, and it's composed of the 3 arms. One arm is evaluating [neoadjuvant] T-DXd for 8 cycles; the second arm B is T-DXd for 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of THP [docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab]; and the [control] arm is AC [doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide] followed by THP. [DESTINY-Breast11] is a phase 3 trial to see whether T-DXd is superior to the current standard [neoadjuvant] therapy.

However, FASCINATE-N was a phase 2 trial. We compared [SHR-A1811 with or without pyrotinib] with the PCbHP regimen, [which features] dual anti-HER2 therapy [trastuzumab and pertuzumab] plus chemotherapy [nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin]. According to the literature, PCbHP [is associated with] a higher pCR rate vs AC followed by THP.

What were the efficacy findings that were presented at the 2024 SABCS?

The pCR rate ranged between 60% to 65% [in all 3 arms]; however, I should mention that the standard [neoadjuvant] therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer is quite [efficacious]. Usually, for [patients with] low-risk HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, we are testing ways to de-escalate treatment. Therefore, in our clinical trial, we tried to enroll patients with higher tumor burden. More than 90% of patients were lymph node positive, and approximately 70% of patients had stage III [disease].

Even with this higher tumor burden, our pCR rate was quite promising. [The pCR rate with single-therapy SHR-A1811 monotherapy was] 63.2%; in patients with hormone receptor [HR]–negative, HER2-positive [disease (n = 47)], the pCR rate was 74.5% [with SHR-A1811 alone], and [in those with] HR-positive, HER2-positive [disease (n = 40)], the pCR rate was 50.0%

What safety findings were observed from this agent?

When compared with the PCbHP, although the proportion of grade 3/4 [treatment-related adverse] effects [TRAEs] was similar, SHR-A1811 monotherapy had lower rates of dose reduction [10.3% vs 13.3%] and drug discontinuation [5.7% vs 16.7%] due to TRAEs. [SHR-A1811 monotherapy was also associated with] lower rates of alopecia, neutropenia, diarrhea, and neuropathy [vs PCbHP].

However, when we combined [SHR-A1811] with [pyrotinib], we had a higher rate of grade 3/4 TRAEs, especially diarrhea.

What are the next steps of research for SHR-A1811?

We have the tumor tissue and blood [samples from enrolled patients] that can all be used in clinical analysis [to assess] the different characteristics, [which could help us identify] different patients with HER2-positive [disease] who may be sensitive to the ADC, PCbHP, both, or neither.

In the future, we could use the ADC as a backbone for select patients if they are sensitive to this kind of [therapy]. Monotherapy may be enough, but if patients are not sensitive [to treatment], we can test why it's not sensitive. We could combine [SHR-A1811] with immune therapy, pertuzumab, or endocrine therapy.

Reference

Li J-J, Wang Z-H, Chen L, et al. HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate SHR-A1811 in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. Presented at: 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-13, 2024; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS1-04.

Related Videos
Polly Niravath, MD
Junjie Li, MD
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Prithviraj Bose, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Eunice Wang, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
David Rimm, MD, PhD
Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, professor, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, director, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine; Louisa and Rand Glenn Family Chair in Breast Cancer Research, director, Glenn Family Breast Center, director, Breast Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Peter Forsyth, MD
David Rimm, MD, PhD, discusses current HER2 immunohistochemistry assays that are used in the management of breast cancer, and their shortcomings.