Article

Novel Therapies Likely to Transform AML Landscape

A combination regimen of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax plus low-dose cytarabine demonstrated an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile in elderly patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia.

Martin S. Tallman, MD

Martin S. Tallman, MD

Martin S. Tallman, MD

A combination regimen of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Venclexta) plus low-dose cytarabine (Depocyt) demonstrated an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile in elderly patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to findings of a phase I dose-expansion study presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.1

Results showed that the overall response rate was 75%, with an estimated 12-month overall survival (OS) rate of 74.7%. The majority of patients, all of whom (n = 20) were ineligible for intensive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, experienced clinical remissions. The median OS had not been reached.

Further clinical trials exploring this early, yet encouraging regimen, add to a growing list of promising therapies for patients with AML, including midostaurin (PKC412) for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated disease. The FDA granted a priority review to midostaurin for this indication in November 2016.

Additionally, venetoclax received a breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA in January 2016 for use in combination with hypomethylating agents in treatment-naïve patients ineligible for standard high-dose induction treatment.

Pracinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, was also granted a breakthrough therapy designation for use in combination with azacitidine (Vidaza) for newly diagnosed patients who are aged more than 75 years or are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

“I want people to know it is an exciting time,” says Martin S. Tallman, MD, hematologic oncologist, chief of Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. “We have many new exciting agents—novel agents—that are going to be rapidly incorporated into the treatment of patients with AML. Finally, we are going to make significant progress in the field.”

OncLive: Can you provide an overview of your presentation?

Tallman, who lectured on the changing AML landscape during the 2016 OncLive® State of the Science Summit on Hematologic Malignancies, sat down for an interview to discuss these novel therapies and the future role of transplantation in more detail.Tallman: The presentation has to do with the state of the art in the treatment of AML in 2017. The state of the art rests on a number of principles. First, the disease is really defined today by cytogenetic and molecular or genomic abnormalities. Second, induction chemotherapy can be intensified for the benefit of patients. Third, consolidation might be able to be deintensified. Fourth, the benefit of allogeneic transplantation has only increased, and there has been an expanded pool of patients who may benefit from transplantation.

What role will transplant continue to have as more agents are developed and improved going forward?

Fifth, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of minimal residual disease studies, both following intensive chemotherapy and before allogeneic transplantation. Finally, and perhaps the most exciting, is the development of new agents that are very promising in the treatment of AML today.More patients are able to undergo transplantation. First of all, we’re able to transplant older adults more safely. We have been able to expand the pool of patients who are potential candidates because of increasing graph sources such as umbilical cord, haploidentical transplant, and combinations of umbilical cord and haploidentical transplant.

Are there any characteristics that patients might have in which you don’t recommend they undergo transplant?

What are some of the novel agents that are moving down the pipeline?

A very important principle that has emerged is that patients who have minimal residual disease before transplantation have less favorable outcomes after transplantation. Now, there are major efforts to try to eradicate all evidence of disease before undergoing transplantation.Patients who have favorable-risk disease, have core binding factor AML, or have acute promyelocytic leukemia, are patients who have a sufficiently favorable outcome without transplantation. Then, they are not going to benefit from transplantation.One of them is the drug called venetoclax. Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor. It’s actually been approved for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but it’s been used very successfully now by patients with myeloid leukemia, particularly in combination with hypomethylating agents such as decitabine (Dacogen) or azacitidine. There have been several studies that have combined it with azacitidine or decitabine, suggesting that the drug in combination is very effective in AML.

At the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting, there was an abstract combining venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine. This is a drug regimen that we don’t give so often anymore but, when combined with venetoclax, looks very promising in the setting of AML. That’s one of the most exciting drugs.

What does the landscape of AML look like to you in the next 5 to 10 years?

There’s another drug that is not as much of a therapeutic drug as it is a supportive care drug, and that is eltrombopag (Promacta). Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist designed to stimulate platelet production following intense chemotherapy for AML. There were several abstracts at the meeting suggesting that, when given an induction or consolidation, there is marked increase in platelet count and we may be able to obviate the need for platelet transfusions and perhaps decrease bleeding.I honestly think there has never been a more exciting time. People say that, but it is really true. We have more drugs with unique mechanisms of action that have effectiveness on their own but are now being combined with each other in chemotherapy. The future is going to be combining novel agents with induction chemotherapy and with each other. We are looking at an exciting next several decades.

Reference

  1. Wei A, Strickland SA, Roboz GJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of venetoclax plus low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive patients aged ≥65 years with acute myeloid leukemia. Presented at: 58th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 3-6, 2016; San Diego, CA. Abstract 102.
Clinicians referring a patient to MSK can do so by visiting msk.org/refer, emailing referapatient@mskcc.org, or by calling 833-315-2722.
Related Videos
Francine Foss, MD
David C. Fisher, MD
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss unmet needs and future research directions in ALK-positive and ROS1-positive NSCLC.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss data for lorlatinib in ROS1-positive NSCLC after crizotinib and chemotherapy.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss data for taletrectinib in ROS1-positive advanced non–small cell lung cancer.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, on progression patterns and subsequent therapies after lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss preclinical CNS data for the ROS1 inhibitor zidesamtinib.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss data for zidesamtinib in ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss data for NVL-655 in ALK-positive NSCLC and other ALK-positive solid tumors.
Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Besse, MD, discuss testing for ALK-positive and ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer.