Article

Panels of Molecular Markers Improve Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer

Author(s):

The application of molecular markers is already significantly improving the diagnosis of thyroid cancer and broader application could help prevent unnecessary surgeries to confirm the diagnosis.

Structure of the BRAF protein.

The application of molecular markers is already significantly improving the diagnosis of thyroid cancer, according to several studies presented during the 82nd annual meeting of the American Thyroid Association, and broader application of mutational panels to tumor samples could help prevent unnecessary surgeries to confirm the diagnosis.

Lindsey Kelly, MD, and colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center analyzed 501 papillary carcinomas from 480 patients for commonly tested as well as for rare mutations. Point mutations, including BRAF exon 15, as well as BRAF/AKAP9 rearrangement, were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and fluorescent melting cure analysis and Sanger sequencing. Rearrangements of PAX8/PPARgamma, RET/PTC1, and RET/PTC3 were detected by TaqMan RT-PCR assays.

“Of 501 tumors, 456 had sufficient material available for informative molecular testing,” investigators noted. Of these, 69.5% of the samples tested were found to be positive for commonly tested mutations including 184 BRAFV600E, found in approximately 40% of the samples, followed by NRAS61, found in 18% of the samples and HRAS in approximately 7%. Much lower levels of other commonly tested mutations including RET/PTCI, RET/PPTC3, and PAX8/PPARgamma were also detected.

In addition, investigators identified rare mutations in 3.7% of the samples. Rare mutations in the papillary carcinomas tested included KRAS61; HRAS12/13; NRAS12/13, and NTRK1 rearrangements. They also identified 2 rare RET rearrangements and 3 rare BRAF rearrangements or point mutations.

Conversely, approximately 27% of the tumor samples tested were negative for mutations. The investigators pointed out that the majority of these were the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer.

“Our analysis of a large series of papillary carcinomas reveals that common mutations are found in 69.5% of tumors, whereas additional known point mutations and rearrangements can be detected in 3.7% of tumors,” investigators observed. “These mutations, with KRAS codon 61 mutation and NTRK1 rearrangements [being the] most prevalent, should be added to the routine mutational panel to improve detection of papillary carcinoma in thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples.”

Meanwhile, in a separate study, Markus Eszlinger, PhD, of University of Leipzig in Germany and colleagues demonstrated that detection of rearrangements (PAX8/PPARgamma, RET/PTC) as well as point mutations BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS is feasible using air-dried fine-needle aspirations. As he reported during the same meeting, researchers extracted RNA and DNA from 310 routine air-dried FNA smears, 164 of which were indeterminate, 57 of which were malignant, and 89 of which were non-neoplastic.

They also examined corresponding formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples of 156 follicular ademonas, 32 follicular thyroid carcinomas, 9 follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas, 44 papillary thyroid carcinomas, and 69 goiters. Using various sequencing techniques, they found that molecular screening of these FNA samples increased the sensitivity from 67% for cytology alone to 75% in the total set. In the indeterminate set with 19 follicular thyroid cancers, the sensitivity of detecting carcinomas and mutation-positive adenomas was 48%, and the specificity was 99%. As investigators pointed out, genetic sequencing for rearrangements and point mutations has been emerging as a nonsurgical approach to the diagnosis of thyroid cancer.

Until now, however, genetic aberrations have only been detected in fresh FNA samples. Screening of air-dried FNA samples with a panel of genetic mutations linked to follicular and papillary thyroid cancer could reduce the need for diagnostic surgery, as investigators suggested.

<<<

View coverage from the 2012 ATA Annual Meeting

Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center