Article

Patient-specific Marker Tracking Approach May Better Detect MRD in CRC

A novel Burning Rock patient-specific prognostic and potential therapeutic marker tracking approach demonstrated improved sensitivity in detecting circulating tumor DNA and identifying molecular residual disease compared with other approaches in patients with colorectal cancer following surgery.

Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal Cancer

A novel Burning Rock patient-specific prognostic and potential therapeutic marker tracking (brPROPHET) approach demonstrated improved sensitivity in detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and identifying molecular residual disease (MRD) compared with other approaches in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following surgery, according to findings presented at the 2023 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

The brPROPHET approach detected ctDNA in 97.3% of the 74 patients enrolled for all 3 MRD assays, a higher value than investigators achieved with the fixed panel with informed calling (FI) assay (75.7%) and the fixed panel with agnostic calling (FA) assay (68.9%). This novel technology was also the only assay to capture baseline ctDNA in 15 of these patients (20.3%), who had lower median ctDNA levels (0.3 mean tumor molecules [MTM] / mL) than those captured by FI and FA fixed panels (3.0 MTM/mL; P < .05).

Across 135 postoperative blood samples tested by all 3 assays, brPROPHET achieved a positivity rate of 14.8%, compared with 8.1% and 6.7% achieved by the FI and FA fixed panel assays, respectively.

“This method [brPROPHET] was developed to detect MRD with a limit of detection of 0.004% and a sample level specificity of over 99% in the analytical validation,” presenting author Di Cao, MD, a physician at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, said during the presentation. “[Our] study reported that the clinical validation of the brPROPHET assay in CRC demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting preoperative and post-operative ctDNA [vs] fixed-panel assays.”

The brPROPHET assay is designed to trace patient-specific somatic variants based on whole-exome sequencing of the tumor tissue and matched white blood cells. It targets up to 55 variants per patient.

The study investigators evaluated assay sensitivities in a population of 117 patients, including 53 (45.0%) with stage II CRC and 41 (35.0%) with stage III. They performed FI and FA fixed panel assays in a subset of patients with a 168-gene panel spanning 273 kilobases of the human genome for comparison with brPROPHET. Sixty (51.0%) patients received adjuvant therapy after surgery.

“Of the designed variants for ctDNA detection, only 6%...were included in the fixed panel. Seventy-five percent of genes selected for panel design were private to a specific patient, suggesting the broadness of MRD detection,” Cao said.

The median patient age of the population was 57 years. Most enrolled patients were male (55.5%), and a plurality had left-sided disease (42.7%) rather than right-sided (26.5%), rectal (23.9%), or transverse (6.8%) disease.

Preoperative ctDNA was detected in 97% of patients (n = 113) overall; much higher detection rates occurred in patients with later stage vs stage I disease. Additionally, median ctDNA levels were higher in patients with later stage disease and correlated with tumor volume.

The overall positivity rate declined to 18% on day 7 following surgery and 15% on day 30.

Two patients relapsed during the short follow-up period; ctDNA was detected prior to radiological relapse in both, with a lead time of 1 and 2 months, respectively.

“Identifying MRD with tailored, tumor-informed, ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays after curative surgery could facilitate the individualized management of [patients with] resected CRC,” the investigators concluded. “Longitudinal monitoring is ongoing for further analysis of clinical outcomes and serial tests.”

Reference

Cao D, Wang F, Zhang R, et al. Patient-specific tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in surgical patients with stage I-IV colorectal cancer (CRC). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(suppl 4):213. doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.3_suppl.213

Related Videos
Paolo Caimi, MD
Jennifer Scalici, MD
Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Victor Moreno, MD, PhD
Aparna Parikh, MD
Benjamin P. Levy, MD, with Kristie Kahl and Andrew Svonavec
Aparna Parikh, MD, associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School; assistant in medicine, Hematology, Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital; attending oncologist, Tucker Gosnell Center for Gastrointestinal Cancers, the Henri and Belinda Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies
Mohammed Najeeb Al Hallak, MD, MS, and Sakti Chakrabarti, MD, on data for neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in dMMR colon cancer.