Feature

Article

Pembrolizumab Plus Adagrasib Demonstrates Preliminary Efficacy in KRAS G12C–Mutated NSCLC

Author(s):

Concurrent adagrasib and pembrolizumab generated early signals of efficacy in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced non–small cell lung cancer harboring KRAS G12C mutations, particularly in those who had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of at least 50%.

Marina Garassino, MD

Marina Garassino, MD

Concurrent adagrasib (Krazati) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) generated early signals of efficacy in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS G12C mutations, particularly in those who had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of at least 50%, according to findings from the phase 2 KRYSTAL-7 trial (NCT04613596) presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress.1,2

“With longer follow-up, concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity in patients with PD-L1 greater than 50% and a manageable safety profile,” Marina Garassino, MD, professor of hematology and oncology at the University of Chicago in Illinois and one of the study’s investigators, said of the mid-stage data.

In patients with a PD-L1 TPS of at least 50%, adagrasib and pembrolizumab generated an overall response rate (ORR) of 63% (32/51; 95% CI, 48-76) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 84% (43/51; 95% CI, 12.6-not evaluable [NE]). The ORR seen with the combination compares favorably with the ORR of pembrolizumab, which ranges from 39% to 45% when used as a single agent.1

Safety Considerations

The safety profile of the combination of adagrasib and pembrolizumab was consistent with the known safety profiles of either agent as a monotherapy. Among the 148 patients, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) led to permanent adagrasib discontinuation in 6% of patients (n = 9), and 11% (n = 16) of patients discontinued pembrolizumab because of TRAEs. Only 4% (n = 6) of patients discontinued both drugs because of TRAEs. Dose reductions due to TRAEs occurred in 46% (n = 66) of patients, and 59% (n = 88) temporarily discontinued treatment because of TRAEs.

Nausea and diarrhea were the most common TRAEs, occurring at any grade in 51 and 44 patients, respectively. Immune-related TRAEs of any grade occurred in 18% (n = 26) of patients, and immune-related TRAEs grade 3 or higher occurred in 5% (n = 8) of patients. There were 2 grade 5 TRAEs of pneumonitis and pneumonia.

Hepatic Safety

“Sotorasib has already shown a severe hepatotoxicity when combined in the first-line with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of [patients with treatment-naïve NSCLC] and also when it was administered sequentially following a prior immune checkpoint inhibitor, in particular, within 30 days,” Garassino said in her presentation.

However, adagrasib does not share the same hepatotoxicity concerns, potentially because of its steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) and low peak-to-trough ratio. The administration of adagrasib sequentially or in combination with pembrolizumab is not limited by hepatotoxicity.

In the KRYSTAL-7 trial, treatment-related hepatic events occurred in less than 10% of patients. Alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) increases were observed in 38 and 32 patients, respectively, but no patient discontinued both adagrasib and pembrolizumab because of an increase in ALT/AST or hepatic TRAEs.

Moreover, hepatic TRAEs, particularly ALT/AST increases, were resolved favorably. The median time to first resolution of increase ALT/AST was 22 days, and resolution occurred in about 80% of cases.

KRYSTAL-7 Trial

KRYSTAL-7’s phase 2 primary end point is ORR to establish the efficacy of adagrasib monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab administered to patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The phase 2 secondary end points are safety, tolerability, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and PK.

The trial consists of 3 cohorts. Cohort 1a includes patients with a PD-L1 TPS of less than 1% who received adagrasib 400 mg twice daily in combination with pembrolizumab. Cohort 1b had a PD-L1 TPS of less than 1% and received adagrasib monotherapy 600 mg twice daily. Cohort 2 had a PD-L1 TPS of at least 1% and received adagrasib 400 mg twice daily with pembrolizumab.

The median follow-up was 8.7 months for all patients and 10.1 months for patients with PD-L1 TPS of at least 50%. The median time to response was 1.4 months, and the median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 8.2-NE).

Patients were eligible for phase 2 if they had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation and any PD-L1 TPS.2

Future of KRYSTAL-7

“These findings support the initiation of a phase 3 trial evaluating concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] vs [pembrolizumab] in treatment naïve KRAS G12C,” Garassino said in her presentation.

The phase 3 KRYSTAL-7 trial plans to begin enrollment at the end of this year.3 The phase 3 primary end point is PFS, and the secondary end points are safety, tolerability, PK, health-related quality-of-life, overall survival, and DoR.

References

  1. Garassino MC, Theelan WSME, Jotte R, et al. KRYSTAL-7: Efficacy and safety of adagrasib with pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2023; October 20-24, 2023; Madrid, Spain. Abstract LBA65.
  2. Mirati presents late-breaking results evaluating the combination of adagrasib and pembrolizumab in first-line non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). News release. Mirati. October 17, 2023. Accessed October 20, 2023. https://tinyurl.com/msuznadj
  3. Phase 2 trial of MRTX849 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab and a phase 3 trial of adagrasib in combination in patients with a KRAS G12C mutation KRYSTAL-7. ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated October 10, 2023. Accessed October 20, 2023.https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04613596
Related Videos
Alec Watson, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute