Video

Reliability of MRD Testing: Sensitivity/Specificity

Transcript:

Michael L. Wang, MD: In general, flow cytometry can detect 1 malignant tumor cell out of 10,000 normal cells, and the PCR [polymerase chain reaction] can detect 1 malignant cell out of 100,000 normal cells. The most current technology, clonoSEQ, claims they can detect 1 out of 1 million. So, you can remember that flow cytometry is 10-4, PCR is 10-5, and the most recent updated technology of circulating DNA aims for 10-6.

The reliability is used as the sensitivity and the specificity. So, with sensitivity, it is very important that the tests are sensitive because if there’s a low level, you are still able to detect it. The specificity means what you’re detecting is the real problem, and not the background noise. So, both specificity and sensitivity of MRD testing is very important. Every test has to improve on their sensitivity and specificity. You can see that in terms of sensitivity, flow cytometry is less sensitive than PCR, and PCR is less sensitive than the most updated technology, such as clonoSEQ. But the technology also improves on the specificity. ClonoSEQ is very specific, and the circulating DNAs are also very specific. So, we’re improving our MRD testing both by sensitivity and by specificity.

The current technology, clonoSEQ, meets the threshold of 1 out of 1 million. It needs further validation, but it’s already being used in many places. The other technologies, the circulating DNA, are way behind, but technologies are being invented. They’re just not validated yet. They’re in the process of being validated.

Transcript Edited for Clarity

Related Videos
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.