Video

Rapid Readouts: Results from the Phase 3 VISION Study

A. Oliver Sartor, MD, presents data from the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021 annual meeting from the VISION study of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

A. Oliver Sartor, MD, discusses data from the following presentation:

  • Phase 3 study of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VISION) (Morris, ASCO 2021, LBA4)
    • The objective of this study is to report results from the phase 3 VISION study (NCT03511664) of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
    • 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a targeted radioligand therapy that delivers β-particle radiation to mCRPC lesions that highly express prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).
    • Men with PSMA-positive mCRPC previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and 1 to 2 taxane regimens were randomly assigned 2:1 to either 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks x 4 to 6 cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone (investigator determined but excluded cytotoxic chemotherapy and radium-223).
    • Alternate primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) using Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 criteria by independent central review, and overall survival (OS).
    • Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR), and time to first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE).
    • Conclusions: efficacy
      • 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC significantly improved median rPFS vs SOC alone (median rPFS, 8.7 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.40 [99.2% CI, 0.29-0.57]; P < .001, one-sided) in the rPFS analysis set (n=581).
      • Median OS was also significantly improved versus SOC alone (median OS, 15.3 vs 11.3 months; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.74]; P < .001, one-sided) in the OS analysis set (n=831).
      • Key secondary end points were statistically significant between the treatment arms in favor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC, including ORR (29.8% vs 1.7%), DCR (89.0% vs 66.7%), and time to first SSE (median time, 11.5 vs 6.8 months; HR, 0.50).
    • Conclusions: safety
      • A higher rate of high-grade treatment-emergent adverse events was observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (52.7% vs 38.0).
      • Fatigue, bone marrow suppression, dry mouth, and nausea and vomiting were the highest all grade and grade 3-5 treatment-emergent adverse events in both study arms.
  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC is a well-tolerated regimen that improves rPFS and prolongs OS compared with SOC alone in men with PSMA-positive mCRPC.
Related Videos
Louis Crain Garrot, MD
Phase 3 MIRASOL Trial: Updated Overall Survival Results of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV) Versus Investigator’s Choice (IC) Chemotherapy in Patients (pts) With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC) and High Folate Receptor-Alpha (FR⍺) Expression
Phase 1/2 ALKOVE-1 study of NVL-655 in ALK-positive (ALK+) solid tumors
Bradley C. Carthon, MD, PhD
Fred Saad, CQ, MD, FRCS, FCAHS, director, Prostate Cancer Research, Montreal Cancer Institute, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; full professor, Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal; uro-oncologist, Urology Department, University of Montreal Health Center
Bertram Yuh, MD, MISM, MSHCPM
Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Phase 2 PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC)
Key Data from the CYTO-PV and MAJIC-PV Studies: Evaluating Ruxolitinib in Polycythemia Vera
Lorenza Rimassa, MD
Daratumumab + Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone in Patients With Transplant-ineligible or Transplant-deferred Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Phase 3 CEPHEUS Study