News
Article
Author(s):
Retifanlimab-dlwr continued to elicit responses with acceptable tolerability in patients with recurrent microsatellite instability–high or mismatch–repair deficient endometrial cancer, according to final findings from cohort H of the phase 1 POD1UM-101 trial.
Retifanlimab-dlwr (Zynyz) continued to elicit responses with acceptable tolerability in patients with recurrent microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, according to final findings from cohort H of the phase 1 POD1UM-101 trial (NCT03059823) presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress.1
At a median follow-up of 26.0 months (range, 2.3-42.5), Retifanlimab elicited an objective response rate (ORR) of 51.3% (95% CI, 39.6%-63.0%), which was comprised of a complete response (CR) rate of 25.0%, a partial response (PR) rate of 26.3%, and a stable disease (SD) rate of 26.3%. Moreover, 19.7% of patients experienced disease progression; this information was missing in 2.6% of patients, as no post-baseline assessments were available. The disease control rate was 77.6% (95% CI, 66.6%-86.4%).
The median duration of response (DOR) was not yet reached (NR; 95% CI, 31.8-not evaluable [NE]), with 87.2% and 76.9% of patients experiencing a response that persisted for at least 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.2 months (95% CI, 6.0-33.4) and the median overall survival (OS) was 30.2 months (95% CI, 19.3-NE).
“In patients with pretreated, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer, retifanlimab [given at] 500 mg every 4 weeks shows characteristic safety and tolerability for this class,” Dominique Berton-Rigaud, MD, of Service d’Oncologie Médicale, GINECO and Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest in Saint-Herblain, France, and colleagues, wrote in a poster on the data. “Based on results from POD1UM-101, further investigation of retifanlimab as monotherapy or in combination with other immunotherapy or targeted agents is ongoing in patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer.”
POD1UM-101 included tumor-specific cohorts and tumor-agnostic flat-dose cohorts.
Those in the tumor-specific cohorts received retifanlimab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks; these patients had endometrial cancer (n = 29; cohort A), cervical cancer (n = 35; cohort B), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 35; cohort C), and non–small cell lung cancer (n = 35; cohort D).
Those in the tumor-agnostic cohorts included those who received the agent at 500 mg every 4 weeks (n = 15; cohort E), those who were given the agent at 750 mg every 4 weeks (n = 15; cohort F), those who received the agent at 375 mg every 3 weeks (n = 15; cohort G), those with MSI-H or dMMR endometrial cancer who received the drug at 500 mg every 4 weeks (n = 88; cohort H), and those with MSI-H or dMMR endometrial cancer in China only at 500 mg every 4 weeks (n = 21; cohort I).
To be included in cohort H, patients needed to have histologically proven, unresectable recurrent endometrial cancer that was MSI-H or dMMR per local testing who had progressed during or after 1 to 5 prior systemic therapies. Patients needed to be at least 18 years of age, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1 criteria, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and acceptable liver and renal function.
If patients had symptomatic or untreated central nervous system metastases or a history of known or suspected autoimmune disease, they were excluded. They could not have previously received an immune checkpoint inhibitor or systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant drugs within 2 weeks before the start of study treatment.
The primary end point of the study was safety and tolerability and secondary end points included ORR, DOR, PFS, OS.
At a data cutoff date of May 17, 2023, a total of 76 patients had been given at least 1 dose of retifanlimab. Patients received a median of 11.5 infusions of the agent (range, 1-26) with a median duration of treatment of 10.0 months (range, 0.03-25.9).
The median patient age was 67 years (range, 49-88). More than half of patients were White (73.7%) and had an ECOG performance status of 1 (57.9%). Regarding tumor stage at study entry, 11.8% had locally advanced disease and 88.2% had metastatic disease. Most patients (80.3%) had visceral metastases. In terms of histology, 92.1% had endometrioid carcinoma and 2.6% had mixed carcinoma. Moreover, 85.5% of patients had MSI-H disease and 14.5% had dMMR disease. In terms of PD-L1 tumor proportion score, 72.4% had a score of less than 1% and 26.3% had a score of 1% or higher.
Most patients (96.1%) received prior systemic treatment for advanced disease with 43.4% having received at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease. Additionally, 71.1% and 89.5% of patients previously received radiotherapy or underwent surgery, respectively.
Earlier data from cohort H of POD1UM-101 showed that at a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range, 1.9-28.3).2 The confirmed ORR with retifanlimab was 43.4% (95% CI, 32.1%-55.3%), with a CR and PR of 14.5% and 29.9%, respectively. The SD rate was 32.9% and 21.1% experienced disease progression. The median DOR was NR and the DCR was 76.3% (95% CI, 65.2%-85.3%). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 5.6-NE) and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 19.3-NE).
Of the 76 patients enrolled in the trial, 30.3% completed treatment and 69.7% discontinued treatment. The most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression or lack of efficacy (44.7%), followed by adverse effect (AE; 17.1%), death (3.9%), other (2.6%), or patient withdrawal (1.3%).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were experienced by 98.7% of patients and 82.9% experienced treatment-related TEAEs. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported in half of patients and 18.4% had grade 3 or higher treatment-related TEAEs. Serious AEs occurred in 40.8% of patients; these effects were treatment related in 7.9% of patients. TEAEs of special interest were reported in 26.3% of patients. TEAEs resulted in discontinuation for 17.1% of patients; they led to interruptions for 36.8% of patients. Two patients experienced TEAEs that resulted in death; 1 had large intestinal stenosis and 1 had renal failure.
The most common treatment-related AEs occurring in at least 5% of patients included fatigue (any-grade, 18.4%; grade ≥3, 0%), diarrhea (15.8%; 1.3%), pruritus (15.8%; 0%), asthenia (14.5%; 0%), arthralgia (10.5%; 0%), rash (10.5%; 1.3%), hypothyroidism (9.2%; 0%), hyperthyroidism (7.9%; 0%), reduced appetite (6.6%; 0%), dry skin (5.3%; 0%), pruritic rash (5.3%; 0%), and vomiting (5.3%; 0%).
Potential immune-related TEAEs that were reported in at least 2 patients included skin reactions (any grade, 13.2%; grade ≥3, 1.3%), hyperthyroidism (10.5%; 0%), hypothyroidism (9.2%; 0%), nephritis (5.3%; 5.3%), pneumonitis (5.3%; 1.3%), hepatitis (3.9%; 2.6%), and Guillain-Barre Syndrome: polyneuropathy (2.6%; 0%).
The safety and efficacy of retifanlimab monotherapy or paired with other agents in patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer who have progressed during or following platinum-based chemotherapy is under evaluation as part of the ongoing phase 2 POD1UM-204 trial (NCT04463771).3
Editor’s Note: Dr Berton-Rigaud did not have anything to disclose.