Article

Rolling Submission Completed for Umbralisib in Previously Treated MZL and Follicular Lymphoma

Author(s):

A new drug application has been completed and submitted to the FDA for the accelerated approval of umbralisib as a treatment for patients with previously treated MZL and follicular lymphoma.

Michael S. Weiss

Michael S. Weiss

A new drug application (NDA) has been completed and submitted to the FDA for the accelerated approval of umbralisib (TGR-1202) as a treatment for patients with previously treated marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and follicular lymphoma.1

"The completion of this NDA submission marks an important milestone in bringing us one step closer to providing umbralisib as a potential treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory MZL and [follicular lymphoma],” Michael S. Weiss, executive chairman and chief executive officer of TG Therapeutics, the developer of umbralisib, stated in a press release. “As a company, this is a very exciting moment for us, as it marks our very first NDA submission, and I commend our team for all their efforts to get to this point.”

Previously, the FDA granted breakthrough therapy designations to the PI3K-delta and CK1-epsilon inhibitor for MZL and orphan drug designations for MZL and follicular lymphoma. The designations are based on results from the multicenter, multi-cohort, phase IIb UNITY-NHL trial (UTX-TGR-205; NCT02742090) investigators evaluated umbralisib as a single agent or in various combination regimens in patients with previously treated NHL.

As of April 2019, enrollment on the MZL cohort was complete, with 72 patients enrolled between July 2017 and August 2018. Sixty-nine patients received umbralisib therapy, 42 of which had 9 months of follow-up—these patients comprised the data from the interim efficacy cohort presented during the 2019 AACR Annual Meeting.2

Patients were treated with 800 mg of umbralisib monotherapy daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. To be eligible for enrollment, patients could have splenic, nodal, or extranodal MZL that required treatment; relapsed/refractory disease that progressed on 1 or more prior lines of therapy that included at least 1 CD20-directed regimen; and an ECOG performance status 0 to 2.

In the interim efficacy population, 23 patients (55%) had extranodal disease, followed by 12 (29%) with nodal and 7 patients (17%) with splenic MZL; this was comparable with the safety population of all patients treated (n = 69). The median age in both cohorts was 67 (range, 34-81); there were more females in the interim efficacy (n = 25; 60%) and safety (n = 36; 52%) populations. The majority of patients in the interim efficacy group (n = 32; 76%) had received rituximab (Rituxan)-based chemoimmunotherapy compared with 50 (72%) in the safety population. Moreover, 8 patients (19%) in the interim efficacy cohort were refractory to their most recent therapy; in the safety population, 18 patients (26%) were refractory to their last treatment. Similarly, 6 (14%) and 15 patients (22%) were refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy in the interim efficacy and safety populations, respectively.

The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by an independent review committee (IRC) by 2007 International Working Group criteria; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response, and safety.

At a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 8.3-18.5) in the interim efficacy population, the ORR was 52% as assessed by both IRC and investigator assessment. The complete response (CR) rates were 19% and 12%, and partial response rates were 33% and 40%, in the IRC- and investigator-assessed cohorts, respectively. The stable disease rates were 36% and 31%, respectively, and progressive disease rates were 7% and 10%. Additionally, the clinical benefit rate was 88% as determined by IRC assessment.

The median duration on treatment was 10.1 months (range, 5.6-15.7), and 55% of patients remain on therapy; this includes all patients who were in CR via IRC assessment.

When stratified by MZL subtype, the ORRs by IRC were 57%, 42%, and 43% for extranodal, nodal, and splenic disease, respectively. Moreover, for patients who had prior chemoimmunotherapy (n = 32), the ORR was 53% via IRC; the ORR was 38% in those who were refractory to their last line of therapy (n = 8).

The median time to initial response was 2.7 months, and 86% of patients (n = 36) experienced a reduction in tumor burden. The median DOR has not been reached (95% CI, 8.4—not estimable) and the median PFS has not been reached. The estimated 1-year PFS rate was 66%.

Ten patients (24%) discontinued therapy for disease progression, 5 (12%) for treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), 2 (5%) due to a non-TRAE, 1 (2%) withdrew consent, and 1 (2%) discontinued due to the investigator’s decision.

Overall, umbralisib was found to be well tolerated in all treated patients, with the highest grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) being diarrhea (10%). Grade 3 infections—comprising bronchitis, pneumonia, and influenza—occurred in 3 patients.

The median duration of exposure to umbralisib was 6.9 months. AEs that led to dose reductions occurred in 6 patients (9%), and 10 patients (14%) discontinued umbralisib for AEs that were potentially treatment related. No deaths have occurred.

AEs of interest and long-term tolerability were also reported. For patients on study for more than 6 cycles, 41 patients were evaluable. The median age was 66 (range, 34-80) and the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-6). Beyond diarrhea (24%; grade 3/4, 5%), all-grade AEs of interest occurring following 6 cycles with the PI3K-delta inhibitor were alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 2%) and pneumonitis (2%; grade 3/4, 2%).

The elevated ALT and aspartate aminotransferase levels appeared time related, as all but 1 case occurred within the first 6 cycles of umbralisib treatment. However, grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred before and after the 6 cycles. There were no treatment discontinuations for treatment-related AEs after 6 months.

Follow-up is continuing for mature overall response, duration, and safety analysis, and phase 3 trials with umbralisib are planned in MZL as well as other subtypes of indolent NHL.

In October 2019, topline findings were announced from the follicular lymphoma cohort (n = 118) of the UNITY-NHL trial.3 Here, results reported thus far showed that umbralisib achieved the primary endpoint of a target ORR of 40% to 50% in the cohort, which was comprised of patients who had received 2 or more prior lines of treatment, including an alkylating agent and a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody.

“Importantly, I also want to thank the patients, their families and the research teams who participated in these trials,” Weiss concluded in the press release. “This has been an incredibly impactful year for TG thus far, with several important milestones yet to come, including topline data from the ULTIMATE trials of ublituximab in multiple sclerosis, presentation of full data from the UNITY-NHL FL/MZL cohorts and from the UNITY-CLL phase 3 trial of umbralisib plus ublituximab (U2), and a [biologics license application]/NDA submission for U2 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia targeted by the end of the year.”

References

  1. TG Therapeutics Completes Rolling Submission of New Drug Application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Umbralisib as a Treatment for Patients with Previously Treated Marginal Zone Lymphoma or Follicular Lymphoma [news release]: New York, NY. TG Therapeutics, Inc. Published June 17, 2020. Accessed June 17, 2020.
  2. Fowler NH, Samaniego F, Jurczak , et al. Umbralisib monotherapy demonstrates efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: A multicenter, open-label, registration directed phase II study. Presented at: 2019 AACR Annual Meeting; March 29 to April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Abstract CT132.
  3. TG Therapeutics Announces Positive Results from the UNITY-NHL Phase 2b Pivotal Trial Evaluating Umbralisib Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma. Published October 28, 2019. Accessed October 29, 2019. https://bit.ly/32YHDAN.
Related Videos
Francine Foss, MD
David C. Fisher, MD
Farrukh Awan, MD
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the role of genomic profiling in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the treatment goals in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss factors for picking intensive chemotherapy vs other regimens in acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss dose intensity and sequencing of CPX-351 in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss long-term data for CPX-351 in acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCloskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss factors to help determine intensive chemotherapy fitness in acute myeloid leukemia.