Commentary

Article

Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Shows Antitumor Activity in Previously Treated Endometrial, Ovarian Cancers

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Sacituzumab tirumotecan monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in previously treated endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS

Gynecologic Oncology

Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT; formerly SKB264/MK-2870) monotherapy generated clinical activity in patients with previously treated advanced endometrial and ovarian cancers, according to findings from the phase 2 KL264-01 trial (NCT04152499).

Preliminary results presented at the 2024 ESMO Congress demonstrated that at a median follow-up of 7.2 months, patients in the endometrial cancer cohort (n = 44) experienced an objective response rate (ORR) of 34.1% per RECIST 1.1 criteria as assessed by investigators; the confirmed ORR was 27.3%. Patients in this cohort had a disease control rate (DCR) of 75.0%, a partial response (PR) rate of 34.1%, and a stable disease (SD) rate of 40.9%.

Preliminary data from the cohort of patients with ovarian cancer (n = 40) demonstrated that at a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the ORR was 40.0%, and the confirmed ORR was 35.0% Patients in this cohort had a DCR of 75.0%, a PR rate of 40.0%, and a SD rate of 35.0% (n = 14).

“Our study showed that sac-TMT monotherapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity in [these] previously treated [patient] populations with a manageable safety profile,” lead study author Danbo Wang, MD, PhD, a professor in the Gynecology Department at Liaoning Cancer Hospital, China Medical University, said in a presentation of the data.

KL264-01 Trial Design and Baseline Patient Characteristics

The study included patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers who received at least 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy and had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. In the endometrial cancer cohort, patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) disease were required to have prior treatment with anti–PD-(L)1 therapy. In the ovarian cancer cohort, at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy were necessary for patients with platinum-sensitive disease.

Sac-TMT was administered at 5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Tumors were assessed once every 8 weeks for the first 12 months and once every 12 weeks thereafter.

The trial’s primary end point was investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST 1.1 criteria; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival, and safety.

In the endometrial cancer cohort, the median age was 58 years (range, 40-73), and patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (31.8%) or 1 (68.2%). The median age in the ovarian cancer cohort was 57.5 years (range, 29-74), and patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (25.0%) or 1 (75.0%). A TROP2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) H-score of more than 200 was shown in 27.3% and 32.5% of patients from the endometrial and ovarian cancer cohorts, respectively. TROP2 IHC H-score of 200 or less was seen in 63.6% and 55.0% of patients, respectively.

In the endometrial cancer cohort, tumor histology included endometroid (54.5%), non-endometroid (31.8%), carcinosarcoma (6.8%), and unknown (6.8%). Only 1 patient (2.3%) had MSI-H/dMMR disease; however, this status was unknown or not tested in 27.3% of patients. Patients received either 1 prior line of systemic therapy (47.7%) or 2 or more prior lines of therapy (52.3%). Prior immunotherapy was given to 36.4% of patients with endometrial cancer.

In the ovarian cancer cohort, tumor histology included high-grade serous (62.5%), non–high-grade serous (20.0%), and other (17.5%). Twenty percent of patients previously received 2 lines of treatment, and 80.0% previously received 3 or more lines of systemic therapy. At study entry, 12.5% of patients had platinum-sensitive disease, and 87.5% had platinum-resistant disease.

At the data cutoff of March 5, 2024, 50.0% and 10.0% of patients from the endometrial and ovarian cancer cohorts, respectively, remained on sac-TMT monotherapy.

Additional Efficacy and Safety Data, Plus Next Steps

The median PFS among patients from the endometrial and ovarian cancer cohorts was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.7-9.4) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.3), respectively. Median DOR was 5.7 months (range, 3.8 to 7.4+) and 5.3 months (range, 2.1 to 24.4+) in the respective cohorts.

Treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) occurred in 100% of patients in both cohorts. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 72.7% and 67.5% of patients from the endometrial and ovarian cancer cohorts, respectively. Serious TRAEs occurred in 20.5% and 37.5% of patients, respectively, with TRAEs leading to discontinuation of sac-TMT in 2.3% of patients with endometrial cancer and 12.5% of patients with ovarian cancer.

“We found [similarities in the] safety profile in these two cohorts. The most common [hematologic] TRAEs were anemia, [decreased] white blood cell [count], and [decreased] neutrophil count,” Wang explained.

Specifically, common all-grade TRAEs included anemia in (endometrial cohort, 88.6%; ovarian cohort, 85.0%, decreased white blood cell count (81.8%; 60.0%), decreased neutrophil count (65.9%; 57.5%), stomatitis (38.6%;57.5%), vomiting (36.4%;40.0%), nausea (27.3%; 42.5%) decreased platelet count (25.0%; 42.5%), and rash (15.9%; 32.5%).

Of note, no TRAEs led to death, and there were no reports of drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis.

Sac-TMT monotherapy is being further evaluated vs physician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy in the ongoing, global phase 3 TroFuse-005 trial (NCT06132958).

Reference

Wang D, Wang K, An R, et al. Safety and efficacy of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced endometrial carcinoma (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) from a phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(suppl 2):S548. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.777

Related Videos
Premal Thaker, MD, MS
Matthew Powell, MD
Alberto Montero, MD, MBA, CPHQ
Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS
Casey M. Cosgrove, MD, gynecologic oncologist, assistant professor, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
Casey M. Cosgrove, MD, gynecologic oncologist, assistant professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
Laura J. Chambers, DO
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD