News

Article

STAT3 Degrader KT-333 is Well Tolerated Across R/R Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors

Author(s):

Key Takeaways

  • KT-333 was well tolerated, with mainly grade 1 and 2 adverse effects in the trial.
  • Significant STAT3 degradation and antitumor activity were observed, including complete responses in Hodgkin lymphoma.
SHOW MORE

KT-333 was well tolerated in relapsed/refractory hematologic and solid tumor cancers, including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Aditi Shastri, MBBS

Aditi Shastri, MBBS

KT-333—a potent, highly selective heterobifunctional small molecule STAT3 degrader—was well tolerated with primarily grade 1 and 2 adverse effects (AEs) in patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), according to data from a phase 1a/1b trial (NCT05225584) shared in a poster presentation at the 2024 EHA Congress.1,2

Data demonstrated that in the overall safety population (n = 47), the most common any-grade AEs to occur included stomatitis (42.6%), fatigue (22.5%), nausea (22.5%), pyrexia (19.1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 17%), constipation (17%), and diarrhea (17%). Grade 3 or higher AEs included stomatitis (4.3%), fatigue (4.3%), increased ALT (2.1%), anemia (4.3%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (2.1%), pruritis (2.1%), and abdominal pain (6.4%).

The most common AES related to KT-333 were stomatitis (38%) and fatigue (17%). Notably, the only grade 3 AEs related to the agent were stomatitis (n = 2), arthralgia (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and decreased weight (n = 1); no AEs higher than grade 3 were attributed to KT-333.

Grade 2 pyrexia occurred in 1 patient with natural killer (NK)–cell lymphoma, and grade 3 stomatitis was reported in 1 patient with large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGL-L), which were both considered serious AEs related to KT-333, and the stomatitis was also a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). One DLT was also reported among patients with solid tumors or lymphoma, which was grade 3 fatigue in a patient treated at dose level 7. Two DLTs occurred in patients with leukemia, which were grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 arthralgia occurring in 2 different patients with LGL-L treated at dose level 5.

As of June 3, 2024, 47 patients had received a mean of 9.1 doses (range, 4.0-12.3) across the first 7 dose levels in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, and LGL-L/T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL).

"KT-333 was well tolerated with primarily grade 1 and 2 AEs. Two DLTs occurred in patients with LGL-L at dose level 5 and 1 DLT was observed in a patient with lymphoma treated at dose level 7. Dose escalation is ongoing at dose level 7 in solid tumors/lymphomas and complete at dose level 4 in patients with leukemia," Aditi Shastri, MBBS, of Montefiore Medical Center, in New York, New York, wrote in the poster.1

STAT3 is associated with the promotion of tumor cell–intrinsic expression of genes relating to survival, proliferation stemness, and metastasis; STAT3 also enhances the differentiation and activity of immunosuppressive cells within the tumor microenvironment. Targeted protein degraders, such as KT-333, represent a novel class of therapeutic compounds. Notably, KT-333 monotherapy demonstrated proof-of-concept antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models of STAT3-dependent PTCL and CTCL.

In September 2023, the FDA granted fast track designation to KT-333 for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL and relapsed/refractory PTCL.3

In the phase 1a portion of the study, patients were required to have relapsed/refractory lymphomas or solid tumors to at least 2 prior treatments, or for which no standard therapy is available. For patients with LGL-L or T-PLL, the disease must be relapsed/refractory to at least 1 prior systemic treatment.

In phase 1b, patients needed to have an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2; and adequate liver, kidney, and bone marrow function. Patients should have PTCL, CTCL, LGL-L, or solid tumors relapsed/refractory to at least 1 prior systemic therapy, or for which no standard therapy is available.

Key exclusion criteria included radiation, anticancer therapy, or major surgery within 4 weeks of study enrollment; autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant within 3 months or allogeneic hematopoietic or bone marrow transplant within 6 months prior to the first dose of the study drug; and patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic leukemia.

Patients were treated at escalating doses in phase 1a, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was used for expansion cohorts in phase 1b. Patients were treated with KT-333 once per week in 28-day cycles at 0.05 mg/kg (dose level 1; n = 4), 0.1 mg/kg (dose level 2; n = 4), 0.2 mg/kg (dose level 3; n = 8), 0.4 mg/kg (dose level 4; n = 14), 0.7 mg/kg (dose level 5; n = 8), 1.1 mg/kg (dose level 6; n = 6), and 1.5 mg/kg (dose level 7; n = 3).

In phase 1a, the primary objective was to determine the overall safety profile of escalating doses of KT-333 and determine the MTD/RP2D. The phase 1b primary objectives were the safety and tolerability of the agent at the RP2D in patients with PTCL, LGL-L, CTCL, and solid tumors. Notable secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and preliminary clinical activity. Exploratory objectives included STAT3 degradation and STAT3-regulated circulating biomarkers in peripheral blood; STAT3/pSTAT3 expression and immune tumor microenvironment profiling; gene expression in peripheral blood and tumor biopsy; and STAT3 mutational analyses.

In the overall population, the median age was 65.0 years (range, 24-81); the majority of patients were male (59.6%); and patients had an ECOG performance score of either 1 (57.4%), 0 (40.4%), or 2 (2.1%). A total of 55.3% of patients had 4 or more prior systemic therapies.

Moreover, patients enrolled had the following tumor types: solid tumors (44.7%), CTCL (23.4%), T-cell LGL-L (8.5%), Hodgkin lymphoma (8.5%), PTCL (6.4%), T-PLL (4.3%), NK-cell lymphoma (2.1%), and B-cell lymphoma (2.1%).

Regarding efficacy, a complete response (CR) was observed in 2 out of 3 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated at dose level 4, both of whom had previously received brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) and at least 1 regimen containing a checkpoint inhibitor. Additionally, a partial response was achieved in 4 out of 9 evaluable patients with TCL treated at dose level 2 and dose levels 4 to 6. A CR was also noted in a patient with NK-cell lymphoma with a STAT3 mutation treated at dose level 7.

“The CRs we’ve shown in Hodgkin lymphoma demonstrate the transformative therapeutic potential of STAT3 degradation, with two heavily pretreated patients [with classical Hodgkin lymphoma] in the KT-333 trial moving to potentially curative stem cell transplants after treatment,” Jared Gollob, MD, chief medical officer of Kymera Therapeutics, stated in a news release.2 “We continue to be encouraged by the data generated in the ongoing phase 1 trial showing clinical translation of our degrader’s profile across multiple hematological malignancies including classical Hodgkin lymphoma, CTCL, and NK-cell lymphoma, and the potential to improve patients’ lives. With dose escalation continuing, we look forward to completing the phase 1 study and sharing the full data set later this year.”

KT-333 demonstrated up to 95% mean maximum STAT3 degradation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at dose level 7. In a patient with TCL, KT-333 led to a significant reduction of STAT3, phosphorylated STAT3, and SOCS3, along with the induction of IFNγ-stimulated genes, including chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, indicating a favorable immunomodulatory response in the tumor microenvironment.1

As of June 3, 2024, 47 patients received a mean of 9.1 doses (range, 4.0-12.3) across the first 7 dose levels. Seven patients remained on treatment, including 2 patients at dose level 3, 4 at dose level 6, and 1 at dose level 7. Consequently, 40 patients discontinued KT-333.

The cited reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (n = 21); discretion of the investigator (n = 7); AEs (n = 3); patient withdrawal (n = 4); physician decision (n = 2); clinical progression (n = 2); and changes in patient's condition that make them ineligible for further treatment (n = 1).

The phase 1b trial investigating KT-333 is ongoing, and Kymera Therapeutics anticipates finishing the study and presenting further clinical data in 2024 at a forthcoming medical meeting.2

References

  1. Shastri A, Feldman T, Barta SK, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of KT-333, a targeted protein degrader of STAT3, in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic and solid tumor cancers. Presented at: 2024 EHA Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract P2040.
  2. Kymera Therapeutics presents new clinical data from the ongoing phase 1 trial of STAT3 degrader KT-333 at EHA Annual Meeting. News release. Kymera Therapeutics. June 14, 2024. Accessed June 26, 2024. https://investors.kymeratx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/kymera-therapeutics-presents-new-clinical-data-ongoing-phase-1-0
  3. Kymera Therapeutics receives US FDA fast track designation for KT-333, a first-in-class, investigational STAT3 degrader for the treatment of relapsed/refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. News release. Kymera Therapeutics. September 18, 2023. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://investors.kymeratx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/kymera-therapeutics-receives-us-fda-fast-track-designation-kt
Related Videos
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
Farrukh Awan, MD, discusses treatment considerations with the use of pirtobrutinib in previously treated patients with hematologic malignancies.
Francine Foss, MD
David C. Fisher, MD
Alex Herrera, MD
Farrukh Awan, MD
Minoo Battiwalla, MD, MS
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the role of genomic profiling in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss the treatment goals in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.
James K. McCluskey, MD, and Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, discuss factors for picking intensive chemotherapy vs other regimens in acute myeloid leukemia.