Video

Surgery Following Systemic Therapy in Melanoma

For High-Definition, Click

The response rate with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab could be higher than reported, as a result of unconventional responses, notes Mario Sznol, MD. In clinical trials, treatment with the combination caused tumor regression in all except one discordant lesion, raising the question of whether surgery could be utilized.

Metastasectomies have demonstrated a five-year survival rate of approximately 40% with in patients with resectable stage IV melanoma in randomized studies, notes Robert H. I. Andtbacka, MD, CM. This approach could be considered, in patients with oligometastatic disease. Utilizing surgery following systemic therapy has some advantages, since it provides a look into the tumors biology and whether it responds to systemic therapy, Andtbacka suggests.

For patients who have been on treatment with a mixed response, a resection can be completed with minimal morbidity, Andtbacka suggests. In some situations, it could be possible to utilize targeted or immuno-therapies as neoadjuvant treatments prior to surgery for patients with advanced melanoma. These therapies could effectively minimize disease burden, making surgery possible, Andtbacka notes.

Patients treated with targeted therapies who experience isolated progression are candidates for resection, believes Jeffrey A. Sosman, MD. This treatment strategy can produce durable responses and keeps patients on an effective therapy for longer. Additionally, specifically in patients treated with a single-agent BRAF inhibitor, it is important to ascertain whether a new lesion is melanoma, since other secondary malignancies can occur, Sosman notes.

Identifying the right therapies for these patients still requires further research. Removing the entire tumor and lymph nodes could potentially have the opposite effect with immunotherapies, since regional nodes could be involved in immune activity, suggests Sznol. Results from the phase III MSLT-II study will provide more data on whether completion lymphadenectomy produces superior results.

Related Videos
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on treatment planning after biomarker testing in NSCLC.