Publication

Article

Oncology Live®

Vol. 17/No. 23
Volume17
Issue 23

The Search for Partners

Author(s):

These days, no one is talking about finding such a simplistic answer for what we now understand is a set of diseases whose complexity continues to unfold. Instead, it has become the norm to think about emerging oncology paradigms in terms of combination therapies.

OncLive Chairman,

Mike Hennessy

In the not-too-distant past, the concept that cancer could be conquered with a “magic bullet” captured the public imagination. Indeed, it was just 15 years ago that TIME magazine hailed the approval of imatinib, one of the first targeted therapies, as a drug that might just be the great breakthrough that would turn the tide against the disease.

These days, no one is talking about finding such a simplistic answer for what we now understand is a set of diseases whose complexity continues to unfold. Instead, it has become the norm to think about emerging oncology paradigms in terms of combination therapies.

That thinking is quite evident throughout this issue of OncologyLive. Although checkpoint blockade immunotherapies burst onto the scene starting in 2011 with the approval of ipilimumab (Yervoy), the thrust of research these days is increasingly focused on how best to combine this new class of agents with other immunotherapies and modalities.

The emphasis on combinations was featured at the 34th Annual CFSTM Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium, as we report in our cover story, “Immuno Combos Gain Steam in Blood Cancers.”

Similarly, much of the news from the 2016 Society for Melanoma Research Congress concerned the efficacy of pairing different molecularly targeted agents.

And, interestingly, the ovarian cancer study that we feature in our Clinical Trial Spotlight involves a 3-drug regimen that includes 2 agents that attack tumor vasculature differently.

It is exciting to think that the antiangiogenic strategy pioneered with bevacizumab (Avastin) has now progressed to a novel dual targeting approach with the goal of depriving the tumor of the blood supply it needs to thrive.

These advances ow from a vastly improved understanding of the biology of cancer. That is why we are pleased to offer the insights of Matthew J. Ellis, MB BChir, PhD, FRCP, in our Precision Medicine in Oncology section in this issue in an article titled “It’s Time to Move Beyond the Genome in Breast Cancer.”

Ellis discusses the emerging science of proteogenomics, a term for the genomic study of the proteome. This is a relatively new term in oncology research but one we are bound to hear about much more in the future.

As Ellis observes, “we are just at the beginning of a new era” in terms of studying single mutations in the context of other mutations that have evolved in the same tumor microenvironment.

We hope you find these articles informative and thought provoking. As always, thank you for reading.

Related Videos
James J. Harding, MD, associate attending physician, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
J. Bradley Elder, MD
Rimas V. Lukas, MD
Adam E. Singer, MD, PhD, Health Sciences Clinical Instructor, medicine, division lead, kidney cancer, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA Health
Diane Reidy-Lagunes, MD, vice chair, Oncology Operations, Regional Care Network, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Shubham Pant, MD, MBBS
Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, professor, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, director, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine; Louisa and Rand Glenn Family Chair in Breast Cancer Research, director, Glenn Family Breast Center, director, Breast Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Brett L. Ecker, MD
Benjamin Garmezy, MD, assistant director, Genitourinary Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, chief, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center