News

Article

TILs May Prognosticate Survival Benefit With Treatment De-escalation in Early HER2+ Breast Cancer

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • TILs independently predict overall survival in HER2-positive early breast cancer, with higher levels correlating with improved outcomes.
  • De-escalation of chemotherapy and trastuzumab duration is safe for patients with TILs ≥20%, without increasing relapse or mortality risk.
SHOW MORE

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes may have prognostic utility for OS outcomes with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer.

Maria Vittoria Dieci, MD

Maria Vittoria Dieci, MD

De-escalation of chemotherapy dose and trastuzumab (Herceptin) duration during adjuvant treatment may not expose patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) levels of at least 20% to an excess risk of disease relapse or death, according to updated results from the 10-year analysis of the phase 3 ShortHER study (NCT00629278) presented at the 2024 ESMO Congress.1

"This is the first demonstration of an independent prognostic role of TILs in terms of overall survival for patients with early HER2 positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment,” Maria Vittoria Dieci, MD, associate professor at the University of Padua in Italy, said during the presentation. “…This data further support the inclusion of immune-related biomarkers into prognostic tools for early HER2-positive breast cancer patients.”

During a median follow-up of 9.02 years, TILs were significantly associated with survival in multivariable analyses. In particular, for each 1% increase in TILs, there was a 3% reduction in the risk for a distant disease-free survival event and a 2% reduction in the risk for death, both of which were highly statistically significant in multivariable analyses, Dieci noted. The HR for a 1% increase in TILs for distant disease-free survival was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = .001) and 0.98 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P = .016).

Researchers also assessed distant disease-free survival by TIL counts. Patients with high TIL counts had a significantly better outcome vs those with low TILs. The HR for distant disease-free survival was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.86; P = .012) for the 20% cutoff, 0.37 for the 30% cutoff (95% CI, 0.17-0.79; P = .011), and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.05-0.87; P = .031) for the 50% cutoff.

“The 10-year distant disease-free survival rate was almost 90% at a 20% cutoff, almost 92% at a 30% cutoff, and almost 97% at a 50% cutoff,” Dieci said.

Similar results were observed for overall survival, with patients with high TILs having consistently better outcomes vs those with lower TILs. HRs for overall survival were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.31-1.09; P = .089) for the 20% cutoff, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.16-0.95; P = .039) for the 30% cutoff, and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.02-1.12; P = .065) for the 50% cutoff. The 10-year overall survival rate for patients with high TILs was above 91% at the 20% cutoff, above 93% at the 30% cutoff, and above 98% at the 50% cutoff.

With this longer-follow-up, there was a significant interaction between TILs and treatment arm for distant disease-free survival.

“For patients with low TILs, there was an evident benefit when they were treated in the long [duration] arm as compared to the short [duration] arm, whereas there was a numerically improved outcome in the for high TILs patients when they were treated in the short arm as compared to the long arm.”

The HR for the interaction between TILs and treatment arm was 1.78 (95% CI, 1.17-2.70; P = .007) for TILs lower than 20% and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.12-1.22; P = .103) for TILs of 20% and higher (P for interaction = .014).

Findings were similar when assessing the interaction between TILs and treatment arm for overall survival.

“A numerically better outcome for patients with low TILs treated in the long [duration] as compared to the short [duration] arm, and a numerically better outcome for patients with high TILs treated in the short [duration] as compared to the long [duration] arm,” Dieci said.

The HR for this interaction for overall survival was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.82-2.23; P = .231) for TILs lower than 20% and 0.36 (95% CI, 0.10-1.36; P = .131) for TILs of 20% and higher (P for interaction = .062).

Background of the ShortHER Trial

There is an ongoing need for prognostic biomarkers to guide treatment de-escalation in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer, Dieci said. She and her colleagues used data from the ShortHER adjuvant trial that tested the de-escalation of a chemotherapy dose and trastuzumab duration in this patient population.

In particular, the ShortHER trial tested the noninferiority of 9 weeks vs 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer. In previously published data, Diece noted that the 10-year overall survival analysis showed “superimposable outcomes” for both treatment arms.

The biomarker of interest in the ShortHER trial is TILs, which was assessed in a sample of 866 patients. At a median follow-up of 6 years, patients with high TILs, defined at a 20% cutoff, had significantly improved distant disease-free survival vs patients with low TILs. In addition, researchers also found a significant interaction between TILs and the treatment arm.

“Specifically, for patients with low TILs, there was a significant benefit when treated in the long [duration] as compared to the short [duration] arm, whereas patients with high TILs experienced a very good distant disease-free survival, irrespectively of treatment arm, with even a numerically better outcome for patients treated in the short arm,” Dieci explained.

Survival endpoints for this study were distant disease-free survival (107 events) and overall survival (74 events). The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic association of TILs with these survival endpoints, in addition to the interaction between TILs and treatment arm.

Reference

Dieci MV, Bisagni G, Bartolini S, et al. TILs and overall survival (OS) in HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC): 10-year (yr) updated analysis of the ShortHER trial. Presented at: 2024 ESMO Congress; September 13-17, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. Abstract 239MO.

Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center