News
Article
Author(s):
Treatment with the second-generation BTK inhibitor tirabrutinib continued to elicit durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma, according to findings from the final 3-year analysis of a phase 1/2 trial.
Treatment with the second-generation BTK inhibitor tirabrutinib continued to elicit durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), according to findings from the final 3-year analysis of a phase 1/2 trial (jRCT2080223590), which were presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting.1
At a median follow-up of 37.1 months and a data cutoff date of April 27, 2022, tirabrutinib generated an overall response rate (ORR) of 63.6% (n = 28; 95% CI, 47.8%-77.6%) in the entire study population, including an ORR of 52.9% (n = 9; 95% CI, 27.8%-77.0%) in patients who received the agent at 480 mg once daily while fasting, which is the approved dose of the agent in Japan. Additionally, the ORR was 60.0% (n = 12; 95% CI, 36.1%-80.9%) in patients who received the agent at 320 mg once daily and 100.0% (n = 7; 95% CI, 59.0%-100.0%) in those who received the agent at 480 mg once daily.
“PCNSL has aggressive symptoms, [and patients have] a poor prognosis,” lead study author Katsunori Asai, MD, PhD, of Osaka International Cancer Institute in Japan, said in an interview with OncLive®.
In 2020, tirabrutinib was approved in Japan for patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL.2 The approval was supported by findings from the phase 1/2 trial. Furthermore, on March 23, 2023, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to tirabrutinib for patients with PCNSL.3
This multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial enrolled 44 patients at least 20 years of age with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70 and relapsed or refractory PCNSL who had received at least 1 prior therapy.1
The primary end point of this trial was ORR by independent review committee. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed ORR, best overall response, duration of response (DOR), disease-free survival, time to response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Patients received tirabrutinib in 1 of 3 arms and continued treatment until disease progression or clinically unacceptable toxicity for the duration of 1, 28-day cycle. Cohort 1 (n = 20) received tirabrutinib at 320 mg once daily, cohort 2 (n = 7) received the agent at 480 mg once daily, and cohort 3 (n = 17) received the agent at 480 mg once daily while fasting.
In the overall population, patients had a median age of 60.0 years (range, 29-86) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 80.0 (range, 70-100). Patients had a median of 2.0 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-14).
At the data cutoff date, 5 patients were still receiving tirabrutinib, 4 of whom were in cohort 3 and 1 of whom was in cohort 1. Of those 5 patients, 4 achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu).
At a median follow-up of 37.1 months (range, 1.4-52.2), in the entire population, the median duration of treatment was 2.7 months (range, 0.8-46.9). Reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression (70.5%), adverse effects ([AEs] 9.1%), and other reasons (9.1%). In cohort 1, at a median follow-up of 37.9 months (range, 4.8-52.2), patients had remained on treatment for a median of 2.3 months (range, 0.9-46.9), and reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression (70.0%), AEs (10.0%), and other reasons (15.0%). In cohort 2, at a median follow-up of 48.6 months (range, 1.4-50.2), the median duration of treatment was 11.1 months (range, 0.8-29.6), and patients discontinued treatment because of disease progression (71.4%) and AEs (28.6%). In cohort 3, at a median follow-up of 36.8 months (range, 2.9-40.1), patients had remained on treatment for a median of 7.4 months (range, 0.9-39.6), and reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression (70.6%) and other reasons (5.9%).
In the overall population, 20.5% (n = 9), 15.9% (n = 7), 27.3% (n = 12), 15.9% (n = 7), and 20.5% (n = 9) of patients achieved best overall responses of CR, CRu, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively, and the median time to response was 0.9 months (range, 0.3-1.2). In cohort 1, 15.0% (n = 3), 10.0% (n = 2), 35.0% (n = 7), 20.0% (n = 4), and 20.0% (n = 4) of patients achieved best overall responses of CR, CRu, PR, SD, and PD, respectively, and the median time to response was 0.9 months (range, 0.9-1.2). In cohort 2, 14.3% (n = 1), 42.9% (n = 3), and 42.9% (n = 3), of patients achieved best overall responses of CR, CRu, and PR, respectively, and the median time to response was 0.9 months (range, 0.3-1.0). In cohort 3, 29.4% (n = 5), 11.8% (n = 2), 11.8% (n = 2), 17.6% (n = 3), and 29.4% (n = 5) of patients achieved best overall responses of CR, CRu, PR, SD, and PD, respectively, and the median time to response was 0.9 months (range, 0.8-1.0).
In all patients, the median DOR was 9.2 months (range, 0.6-45.9), the 12-month DOR rate was 46.4% (95% CI, 27.6%-63.3%), and the 36-month DOR rate was 19.8% (95% CI, 7.4%-36.5%). In cohort 1, the median DOR was 3.7 months (range, 0.6-45.9), and the 12- and 36-month DOR rates were 41.7% (95% CI, 15.2%-66.5%) and 20.8% (95% CI, 3.5%-47.9%), respectively. In cohort 2, the median DOR was 10.2 months (range, 0.6-28.7), the 12-month DOR rate was 42.9% (95% CI, 9.8%-73.4%), and the 36-month DOR rate was 0% (95% CI, not available [NA]-NA). In cohort 3, the median DOR was 12.1 months (range, 0.9-38.7), and the 12- and 36-month DOR rates were 55.6% (95% CI, 20.4%-80.5%) and 33.3% (95% CI, 7.8%-62.3%), respectively.
In the entire trial population, the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-11.1), the 12-month PFS rate was 32.5% (95% CI, 18.9%-46.9%), and the 36-month PFS rate was 13.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-26.7%). In cohort 1, the median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-18.2), and the 12- and 36-month PFS rates were 29.4% (95% CI, 11.0%-50.7%) and 14.7% (95% CI, 2.7%-36.2%), respectively. In cohort 2, the median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI, 1.4-22.0), the 12-month PFS rate was 42.9% (95% CI, 9.8%-73.4%), and the 36-month PFS rate was 0% (95% CI, NA-NA). In cohort 3, the median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 1.0-13.0), and the 12- and 36-month PFS rates were 31.7% (95% CI, 11.6%-54.1%) and 19.0% (95% CI, 4.7%-40.6%), respectively.
Overall, the median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 21.0-NA), the 12-month OS rate was 72.7% (95% CI, 57.0%-83.5%), and the 36-month OS rate was 56.7% (95% CI, 40.9%-69.8%). In cohort 1, the median OS was 37.9 months (95% CI, 11.2-NA), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 75.0% (95% CI, 50.0%-88.7%) and 55.0% (95% CI, 31.3%-73.5%), respectively. In cohort 2, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 1.4-NA), the 12-month OS rate was 85.7% (95% CI, 33.4%-97.9%), and the 36-month OS rate was 71.4% (95% CI, 25.8%-92.0%). In cohort 3, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 5.5-NA), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 64.7% (95% CI, 37.7%-82.3%) and 52.9% (95% CI, 27.6%-73.0%), respectively.
Of the entire trial population, 20 patients were treated for at least 6 months, and 6 patients received treatment for 3 years.
Across all treated patients, AEs of any grade occurred in 86.4% (n = 38), and AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 52.3% (n = 23). The most common AEs included rash (any-grade, 36.4%; grade ≥ 3, 2.3%), erythema multiforme (11.4%; 6.8%), drug eruption (9.1%; 4.5%), neutropenia (27.3%; 9.1%), leukopenia (25.0%; 9.1%), lymphopenia (18.2%; 6.8%), thrombocytopenia (11.4%; 0%), anemia (9.1%; 0%), increased blood bilirubin (9.1%; 2.3%), constipation (13.6%; 0%), stomatitis (11.4%; 0%), nausea (11.4%; 2.3%), vomiting (9.1%; 0%), epipharyngitis (11.4%; 0%), headache (11.4%; 0%), pyrexia (9.1%; 0%), hypokalemia (9.1%; 4.5%), and decreased appetite (9.1%; 2.3%).
In cohort 1, AEs of any grade occurred in 80.0% (n = 16) of patients, and AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.0% (n = 7) of patients. The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (10.0%), leukopenia (10.0%), erythema multiforme (5.0%), drug eruption (5.0%), increased blood bilirubin (5.0%), and decreased appetite (5.0%).
In cohort 2, AEs of any grade occurred in 100% (n = 7) of patients, and AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.4% (n = 5) of patients. The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were erythema multiforme (28.6%), lymphopenia (28.6%), drug eruption (14.3%), and hypokalemia (14.3%). One patient in cohort 2 experienced grade 5 pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and interstitial lung disease 32 days after tirabrutinib treatment initiation.
In cohort 3, AEs of any grade occurred in 88.2% (n = 15) of patients, and AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 64.7% (n = 11) of patients. The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), lymphopenia (5.9%), nausea (5.9%), hypokalemia (5.9%), and rash (5.9%).
“Atrial fibrillation of any grade was not detected,” Asai said in the interview.
Most patients experienced their first treatment-related AE within 6 months of initiating tirabrutinib.
“Tirabrutinib showed durable responses and long-lasting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL,” Asai said to OncLive®.
Disclosures: Dr Asai reports institutional research funding from Ono Pharmaceuticals.