Article

Tislelizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Yields Preliminary Efficacy in NMBIC

The combination of tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel demonstrated benefit and a tolerable safety profile in patients with high-risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Patients with high-risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) experienced benefit and a tolerable safety profile with the combination of tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane), regardless of PD-L1 expression, according to preliminary data presented at the 2022 American Urological Association Annual Meeting.

In TRUCE-02, an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (NCT04730232), there was a complete response (CR) rate of 62.5%, which met the primary end point of the trial. Additionally, the high-grade adverse events (AEs) rate was lower than 5% across the study participants.

Previously, the PEANUT trial (NCT03464734) investigating pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus nab-paclitaxel showed a significant CR rate and low AE rate in the second-line treatment of patients with bladder cancer. The phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 trial (NCT02625961) also demonstrated efficacy and safety with pembrolizumab monotherapy as antitumor treatment in Bacille Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive patients with HR-NMIBC. Previously, tislelizumab showed efficacy in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and TRUCE-02 investigators are seeking to confirm the benefit of tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel.

In this trial, patients with HR-NMIBC that cannot be completed resected received 3 or 4 cycles of tislelizumab on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on day 2, both at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks followed by a multipoint resection biopsy. The primary end point is the patients’ CR rate, and secondary end points included cystectomy-free survival, duration of response, and the number and severity of AEs. The biospecimens of patients’ tumors were sent for analysis by AcornMed panel, which targets 808 cancer-related hotspot genes, before starting treatment. Immunohistochemistry staining was used to measure PD-L1 expression and whole-genome sequencing was used to evaluate urine sediments.

So far, 51 patients have been enrolled in the TRUCE-02 study; 32 patients have completed treatment of 3 or 4 cycles and met the primary end point. There were 20 patients of the 32 total who achieved CR, with a CR rate of 62.5%. Furthermore, 4 patients (12%) experienced a partial response (PR), and 5 (16%) had stable disease. Progressive disease was observed in 3 patients (9%). Currently, 4 patients (12.5%) have proceeded to cystectomy after treatment.

Positive PD-L1 expression was found in 12 (50%) out of the 24 patients who had response of either CR or PR. Three patients out of 8 (38%) who were unresponsive to treatment had positive PD-L1 expression. However, homologous recombination repair mutations may predict favorable prognosis, according to the investigators. The whole-genome sequencing results of patients’ tumor tissue and urine were considered uniform.

In patients receiving the tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel, the most common low-grade treatment-related AEs included alopecia in 81% and fatigue in 34%. All other AEs were seen in 7% of patients or fewer. Immune-related severe AEs included cytokine release syndrome in 1 patient (3%) and 1 patient (3%) with popular and pustular rash.

The median age on the trial was 67 years (range, 44-85), and there were 25 male patients recruited. Patients had to have an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. If patients had previously received PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 antibodies, or other immunotherapies previously, they could not be enrolled on the trial.

Reference

  1. Hu H, Niu Y, Wang H, et al. Update of TRUCE-02: an open label, single-arm, phase 2 study of tilelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel for high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (HR-NMIBC) which is not completely resectable. Presented at: 2022 American Urological Association Annual Meeting; May 13-16, 2022; New Orleans, LA. Abstract MP59-19.
Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center