Video

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for HER2+ Breast Cancer

Transcript:

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Komal, do you want to talk about some of these novel ADCs, these novel antibody drug conjugates, for HER2?

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: I think this has been a very exciting time for antibody drug conjugates, for sure. And surely, we all have experience and a lot of clinical data, including overall survival, with our first prototype antibody drug conjugate in the HER2-positive subtype, which is either trastuzumab emtansine or T-DM1. But we’re now looking at other next-generation, antibody-drug conjugates, and one among them that certainly caught my attention was the Daiichi compound, DS-8201a or trastuzumab deruxtecan as they call it.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: We’ll never pronounce that. I just remember TrasD. Not T-DM1, TrasD.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: I’m totally working on that one.

Lee Schwartzberg, MD, FACP: Very impressive.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: I just coined it, TrasD.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: We have the “ibs” and the “mAbs” to worry about, and now we also have the “tecans” to worry about. Unlike what we have in an antibody-drug conjugate, in T-DM1 our payload, our drug conjugate, is a maytansine derivative. This one is a TOPO1 [topoisomerase] inhibitor derivative. It’s the trastuzumab antibody with a protease-cleaved linker to this payload, which is a TOPO1 inhibitor. But what was very impressive was that there were 2 cohorts that were presented. One was a HER2-positive cohort that was pretreated and heavily pretreated, including patients with pertuzumab and T-DM1, and then there was a HER2 low-expressing cohort. In both of these, there was activity seen, 61% overall response rates in the HER2-positive cohort and about 30% in the HER2 low expressers. This includes ER-positive, HER2-negative, and triple-negative patients. So, I thought it was nice to see those data.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: It was always thought that TOPO inhibitors had some response in breast. They’ve always been sneaking around.

Hope S. Rugo, MD: Oh, they do, they do.

Lee Schwartzberg, MD, FACP: They do, yes.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: It has always been in the abstracts at meetings for years.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: And we use that. I have used that. I agree. I think we agree and we use that, but what was novel here is that in T-DM1, the drug to antibody ratio is about 3.5 to 1; this is 8 is to 1.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Right, so it’s a better delivery.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: Correct. And so, there was not increased toxicity. Duration of response was really, really impressive with some patients, as long as 1-and-a-half years into the study. This drug actually has breakthrough designation with the FDA, so I think it’s an impressive compound and great data.

Hope S. Rugo, MD: And a randomized trial.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: There’s a randomized against physician's choice.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: Right, I think it’s called DESTINY.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Is it called DESTINY?

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: I think so.

Francisco Esteva, MD, PhD: T-DM1 did not seem to work in low-HER2 expressers.

Hope S. Rugo, MD: Right.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Probably because of the payload. I think that’s a really good point that Komal has brought up. It’s a payload issue if you’re only using 3:1 as opposed to 8:1, that’s a very good point. Personally, I think TOPO inhibitors are probably better than emtansine as chemotherapy in general.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: Right.

Lee Schwartzberg, MD, FACP: And it’s probably still reaching the target because we have low levels of HER2 on breast cancer cells.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: Right.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Correct.

Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP: Absolutely. I think these are all T-DM1—resistant patients.

Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD, FACP: Which is even more fascinating, and I can’t wait to see that randomized trial. We’re going to participate. I don’t know if you guys are. It’s a great trial.

Hope S. Rugo, MD: We are, too.

Transcript Edited for Clarity

Related Videos
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.