News

Article

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Sustains Survival Benefits in HER2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author(s):

Treatment with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki led to sustained improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival vs physician’s choice of treatment in patients with previously treated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, irrespective of hormone receptor status.

Shanu Modi, MD

Shanu Modi, MD

Treatment with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd; Enhertu) led to sustained improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs physician’s choice of treatment in patients with previously treated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, irrespective of hormone receptor status, according to results from the 32-month follow-up of the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 trial (NCT03734029) presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress.1

For all patients, the median overall survival (OS) at the primary analysis was 23.4 months (95% CI, 20.0-24.8) in the T-DXd arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.5-20.0) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84). At the updated analysis, OS was 22.9 months (95% CI, 21.2-24.5) vs 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.1-19.5) between both arms, respectively (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86).

At 24 months, the OS rate in the T-DXd arm was 47.3% (95% CI, 41.9%-52.4%) vs 32.0% (95% CI, 24.5%-39.3%) in the physician’s choice arm. At 36 months, the OS rate between both arms was 26.2% (95% CI, 20.6%-31.9%) and 16.3% (95% CI, 10.3%-23.6%), respectively.

“These results [from the longer follow-up of DESTINY-Breat04] continue to support the use of T-DXd as the new standard of care after 1 line of chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer,” presenting author Shanu Modi, MD, an attending physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, stated during the conference.

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either T-DXd (n = 373) at 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks or physician’s choice therapy with capecitabine, eribulin (Halaven), gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane; n = 184). To be enrolled, patients needed to have HER2-low disease, defined by an immunohistochemistry of 1+ or 2+. Patients must also have had unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer and been previously treated with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease needed to be considered endocrine refractory.

The updated data cutoff was March 1, 2023, and the median follow-up was 32.0 months (95% CI, 31.0-32.8).

For patients who were hormone receptor positive, the median OS at the primary analysis was 23.9 months (95% CI, 20.8-24.8) in the T-DXd arm (n = 331) vs 17.5 months (95% CI, 15.2-22.4) in the physician’s choice arm (n = 163; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88), and at the updated analysis, median OS was 23.9 months (95% CI, 21.7-25.2) vs 17.6 months (95% CI, 15.1-20.2; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.87). The 24-month OS rates were 49.0% (95% CI, 43.3%-54.5%) in the T-DXd arm and 35.1% (95% CI, 27.3%-43.0%) in the physicians’ choice arm.

Modi noted that findings were consistent with previously reported results that were seen in the primary analysis, of which there was a 31% reduction in the risk of death for patients being treated with T-DXd vs physician's choice chemotherapy.2

The median PFS in all patients of the primary analysis was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-9.8) in the T-DXd arm vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.45). In the updated analysis, the median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-9.8) in the T-DXd arm and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.29-0.45). At 24 months, the PFS rate in the T-DXd arm was 14.5% (95% CI, 10.8%-18.7%).

For patients with hormone receptor–positive disease in the primary analysis, the median PFS in the T-DXd arm was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-10.0) vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47). The updated analysis showed a median PFS of 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-10.0) in the T-DXd arm vs 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.46). The 24-month PFS rate was 15.4% (95% CI, 11.3%-20.0%) with T-DXd.

An exploratory analysis assessed patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. OS in the primary analysis was 18.2 months (95% CI, 13.6-not evaluable) with T-DXd compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6-20.6) in the physician's choice arm (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.95). The updated analysis showed an OS of 17.1 months (95% CI, 13.6-23.0) compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6-20.4) between both arms, respectively (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.31-1.08).

The 24-month OS rates were 22.4% (95% CI, 18.5%-47.5%) in the T-DXd arm compared with 11.8% (95% CI, 2.0%-31.2%) in the physician's choice arm.

The median PFS in the primary analysis by blinded independent central review was 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-11.7) in the T-DXd arm vs 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4-5.1) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89). The updated analysis by investigator review highlighted a median PFS of 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.5) in the T-DXd arm and 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15-0.57).

Modi noted that there was a 42% reduction in the risk of death and a 71% reduction in disease progression in this hormone receptor–negative population receiving T-DXd.

In all patients, the PFS2 was 15.4 months (95% CI, 13.6-16.5) in the T-DXd arm vs 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.3-10.8) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.64). In the hormone receptor-positive cohort, the median PFS2 was 15.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-17.2) in the T-DXd arm and 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.3-11.4) in the physician’s choice arm (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40-0.64).

Treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 54.4% of patients in the T-DXd arm and 67.4% in the physician’s choice arm, with serious TEAEs occurring in 29.1% vs 25.6%. Due to TEAEs, treatment discontinuation was reported in 16.7% vs 8.1%, dose interruptions in 41.8% vs 42.4%, dose reductions in 24.0% vs 37.8%, and deaths in 4.0% vs 2.9% of the T-DXd and physician’s choice arms, respectively. Deaths that occurred while on treatment were reported in 3.8% vs 4.7%.

The most common drug-related TEAEs that were grade 3 or higher in the T-DXd arm were neutropenia (14%), anemia (9%), and fatigue (8%). For those on the physician’s choice arm, the most common were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (19%), and transaminases increase (11%).

References

  1. Modi S, Jacot W, Iwata H, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: updated survival results of the randomized, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(suppl 2):S334-S335. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.553
  2. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(1):9-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203690
Related Videos
Albert Grinshpun, MD, MSc, head, Breast Oncology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH, director, clinical research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; associate professor, medicine, Harvard Medical School
Stephanie Graff, MD, and Chandler Park, FACP
Mariya Rozenblit, MD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Yale School of Medicine
Maxwell Lloyd, MD, clinical fellow, medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neil Iyengar, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Azka Ali, MD, medical oncologist, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
Rena Callahan, MD, and Chandler Park, MD, FACP
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, Winterhof Family Endowed Professor in Breast Cancer, professor, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), director, Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education; medical director, Cancer Infusion Services; the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, professor, medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, The University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center San Antonio; leader, breast cancer program, Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center