Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, MD, PhD, discusses data from the following presentation:
- Improved Transfusion Independence Rates for Momelotinib vs Ruxolitinib in Anemic JAKi Naïve Myelofibrosis Patients are Independent of Baseline Platelet or Transfusion Status (Kiladjian, EHA 2021, EP1081)
- The objective of this study is to report transfusion independence results from the SIMPLIFY-1 trial (NCT01969838) in JAK inhibitor–naïve patients with myelofibrosis who were treated with momelotinib (MMB) vs ruxolitinib (RUX).
- Phase 3, double-blind trial with 1:1 randomization to MMB or RUX (N = 432)
- MMB is an inhibitor of JAK1, JAK2, and ACVR1/ALK2; RUX is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor
- Previously reported results:
- Week 24 (W24) transfusion independence (TI) response rate: 67% on MMB vs 49% on RUX
- Median overall survival: 53 months in the RUX arm, not reached in the MMB arm
- Results
- Treatment with MMB resulted in higher TI rates vs RUX in all patient subsets with baseline (BL) hemoglobin (Hgb) ≤ 14 g/dL, and in all subsets defined by BL platelets (PLTs) and by BL transfusion status.
- W24 TI rate by BL Hgb:
- < 8 g/dL: 29% MMB vs 18% RUX
- < 10 g/dL: 47% MMB vs 27% RUX
- < 12 g/dL: 62% MMB vs 37% RUX
- ≤ 14 g/dL: 67% MMB vs 46% RUX
- > 14 g/dL: 64% MMB vs 89% RUX
- W24 TI rate by BL PLTs
- < 150 x 109/L: 62% MMB vs 43% RUX
- < 300 x 109/L: 68% MMB vs 48% RUX
- ≥ 300 x 109/L: 63% MMB vs 51% RUX
- W24 TI rate by BL transfusion status
- TI: 81% MMB vs 62% RUX
- Transfusion requiring (neither transfusion dependent [TD] nor TI): 53% MMB vs 31% RUX
- TD: 30% MMB vs 17% RUX
- Conclusions
- Data suggest that an MMB-mediated TI response at week 24 is associated with a survival advantage.
- These data support the potential benefit of MMB’s ACVR1/ALK2 inhibitor activity in addition to inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2.