Video

Use of Regorafenib in Refractory mCRC

For High-Definition, Click

Along the continuum of care for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the patient may go through several lines of treatment. The number varies depending on many factors, including the molecular profile of the tumor. For example, in a patient with a RAS wild-type tumor, treatment may begin with FOLFOX/bevacizumab and then proceed to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, aflibercept, or ramucirumab at progression. If the third-line choice is an anti-EGFR antibody and the patient’s disease continues to progress, regorafenib is a viable treatment option, Fakih states.

Regorafenib was approved based on the CORRECT clinical trial, conducted in patients who progressed on or were intolerant to all systemic chemotherapies and to anti-EGFR therapy in the setting of KRAS wild-type mCRC. Compared with placebo, regorafenib improved overall survival by 23%. The CORRECT trial enrolled patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.

For younger patients and those with good PS, the 160-mg starting dose that was used in the trial is appropriate. However, for older patients, at starting dose of 120 mg should be considered, which can be escalated in cycle 2 if the patient tolerates the drug well, Fakih suggests. Toxicities should be carefully monitored during the first cycle, specifically within the first week of therapy.

Data presented from the CONCUR trial during the 2014 ESMO meeting showed a 45% improvement in overall survival with regorafenib versus placebo in Asian patients with mCRC that progressed after standard therapies. Notably, overall survival in this highly refractory group of patients was 8.8 months. Unlike the larger CORRECT trial, the CONCUR study did not require participants to have received previous therapy with bevacizumab.

While it is unclear why the results were better in Asian versus North American and European patients, one theory involved the absence of bevacizumab in a subgroup of patients. Overall survival was better in the group that had not received any targeted therapy. Nonetheless, the results confirm that for patients in whom everything else has failed, there is an improvement in overall survival associated with the use of regorafenib, Fakih states.

Related Videos
Cedric Pobel, MD
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on tissue and liquid biopsies for biomarker testing in NSCLC.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the benefits of in-house biomarker testing in NSCLC.