Publication

Article

Oncology Live®

July 2011
Volume12
Issue 7

Interim Safety Data Compared in Ixabepilone TITAN Trial

Researchers are continuing to explore whether ixabepilone (Ixempra) is a better choice as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer than the standard paclitaxel (Taxol).

ixabepilone (Ixempra)

Researchers are continuing to explore whether ixabepilone (Ixempra) is a better choice as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer than the standard paclitaxel (Taxol).

In one facet of that research, the toxicity profile of ixabepilone is proving to be similar to weekly paclitaxel, making it a feasible option, researchers said in presenting preliminary safety monitoring data for the phase III TITAN trial.

The trial includes an estimated 1800 women initially treated with doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide and then randomized to receive either ixabepilone at 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 12 weeks or paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 every week for 12 weeks.

The Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee, launched the 5-year study in 2008 at 71 sites in the United States and Puerto Rico.

The safety data involve the first 441 patients who completed the treatment regimen, according to a poster presented at ASCO by lead investigator Denise Aysel Yardley, MD, an oncologist at Sarah Cannon.

Overall, “the incidence and spectrum of toxicity” were similar in the 2 treatment arms, investigators reported. The most frequently reported hematologic toxicity in both arms was grade 3/4 neutropenia, with incidents totaling 26 in the ixabepilone arm versus 12 in the paclitaxel group.

There was 1 treatment-related death in the ixabepilone arm from neutropenia/ sepsis, versus 0 deaths in the paclitaxel group.

The number of patients discontinuing treatment prematurely was higher in the paclitaxel arm at 15%, versus 8% in the ixabepilone arm, with neuropathy accounting for most of the difference (8% vs 3%). Abstract 1103

Related Videos
Cedric Pobel, MD
Ruth M. O’Regan, MD
Anna Weiss, MD, associate professor, Department of Surgery, Oncology, associate professor, Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medicine
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), professor, pharmacology, deputy director, Yale Cancer Center; chief, Hematology/Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; assistant dean, Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses the role of multidisciplinary management in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses preliminary data for zenocutuzumab in NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses how physician assistants aid in treatment planning for NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses DNA vs RNA sequencing for genetic testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Haley M. Hill, PA-C, discusses current approaches and treatment challenges in NRG1-positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Jessica Donington, MD, MSCR, Melina Elpi Marmarelis, MD, and Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, MD, on the next steps for biomarker testing in NSCLC.